SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Neocon's Seminar Thread
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1112 21 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
912Another stretch I am afraid. I would not go to a group of merchant marines statione_less-9/4/2003
911I see that once again you want to drop into polysyllabic insults. No need, I caTigerPaw-9/4/2003
910<i>I approach each of my children differently </i> I believe you arTigerPaw-9/4/2003
909You are creating your own phantasms to shadow box.Neocon-9/4/2003
908You want to imply that collusion is an all or nothing proposition; that if thereTigerPaw-9/4/2003
907That seems like a pretty big stretch. It means little more to me than "don&one_less-9/4/2003
906Here is how your arguments look to me, usually: John Kerry is a member of SkullNeocon-9/4/2003
905<i>On the basis of what evidence did you extrapolate this as a core philosTigerPaw-9/4/2003
904<i>hen you are a fool.</i> So you say. TPTigerPaw-9/4/2003
903<i>"To be blunter, I think that is a core philosiphy of the neocons, one_less-9/4/2003
902Then you are a fool.Neocon-9/4/2003
901I don't understand. On the first topic.... Are you saying that secrecy is TigerPaw-9/4/2003
900To be more plain: Once you accept the notion that it is okay to lie to some peoTigerPaw-9/4/2003
899You could basically take every sentence in your post, add "no", "TimF-9/4/2003
898You are kind of a nut. I do not even think you can explain what you think you arNeocon-9/4/2003
897<i> have no idea what you are running on about</i> So you say. ThTigerPaw-9/4/2003
896<i>it isn't more corrupt then it was before this administration took oTigerPaw-9/4/2003
895I have no idea what you are running on about. Your hypothetical is wholly fictitNeocon-9/4/2003
894American people are like most people throughout time and places. When they are cone_less-9/4/2003
893<i>the very idea of meritocracy </i> When the goals, tests, and graTigerPaw-9/4/2003
892I'm not sure that Lenin's intentions were really all that good, but thenTimF-9/4/2003
891I really don't feel like dealing with your rants today.....Neocon-9/4/2003
890Message 19271739MSI-9/4/2003
889You are a piece of work. First, you made an issue of provenance. I merely pointeNeocon-9/4/2003
888Highly entertaining - Orwell couldn't have said it better...MSI-9/4/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):