SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9193 Christine, David, Jeff, O/49r, I thank you for your thoughtful responses to my William Peavey-11/20/1999
9192 Christine - <i>For what it is worth, IBM is the only technology company David Eddy-11/20/1999
9191 David: Interesting that you should mention IBM. One of my savviest friends beChristine Traut-11/20/1999
9190 Christine - <i>They thought that they would be the 'poster child'David Eddy-11/20/1999
9189 Cheeky, (OT) Obviously an area with which you are familiar. Collision Shop isWilliam Peavey-11/20/1999
9188 Re:>>Now please to tell me how/why this is NOT a problem?<< JustJeff Mizer-11/20/1999
9187 From NEWSMAX.Com Link :http://216.46.238.34/articles/?a=1999/11/16/191538 Jeff Mizer-11/20/1999
9186 Cheeky - <i>Blowing things out of proportion again I see. </i> DeDavid Eddy-11/20/1999
9185 Canada may be Y2K threat ? Although it gets high marks for Y2K readiness, CanaJeff Mizer-11/20/1999
9184 Cheeky you don't have a clue... but your good entertainment when I am boredJeff Mizer-11/20/1999
9183 You don't know what you're talking about. Cheeky Kid-11/20/1999
9182 If you are a DRP you have to use the estimating program the insurance company wCheeky Kid-11/20/1999
9181 RE:>>why I am so disturbed about Y2K. I really do not have our systems fiJeff Mizer-11/20/1999
9180 <<I believe that the building resentment against Microsoft's abusive William Peavey-11/20/1999
9179 Cheeky, Unfortunately Mitchell IS the company that coincidentally purchased anWilliam Peavey-11/20/1999
9178 David: Thanks for the reminder and URL to your latest MSFT column. I am in toChristine Traut-11/20/1999
9177 Blowing things out of proportion again I see. I have no idea what Bill is talCheeky Kid-11/20/1999
9176 Christine/Bill - <i>I did read that far. And you have my complete sympatDavid Eddy-11/20/1999
9175 Well, Bill, I READ your entire contribution, and not only understood but FELT yIngotWeTrust-11/20/1999
9174mitchell.com mitchell.com mitchell.comCheeky Kid-11/20/1999
9173 Bill: <If you've read this far, you can see why I am so disturbed aboutChristine Traut-11/20/1999
9172 A personal tale. I am essentially retired from the automobile collision repairWilliam Peavey-11/20/1999
9171 >>someone made the observation that Y2K could not be much of a threat bedaffodil-11/20/1999
9170 " Smart " people wrote software and designed chips that would fail inRunner-11/20/1999
9169 I believe they "checked" that feature. Or they are too honest! RuRunner-11/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):