SEC Investigations /Lawsuits - Let's keep SI stds up

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
SEC Investigations /Lawsuits - Let's keep SI stds up

An SI Board Since March 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
117	10	0

Emcee: QuietWon	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
92	Yes, I did. We are dealing with some interesting issues here. I shall have to	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
91	Edwarda, did you see my post of classifications of posters? perhaps whoever it	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
90	The same might apply to employees of the various companies, people who are not	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
89	Such people are generalists. Good generalists tend to have a lot of experience	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
88	ok, yup. Good pt	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
87	My point was that the employers of investment professionals would be likely to	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
86	Suppose we all that are NOT paid remain anonymous - that's ok with me - it&	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
85	I'm not an analyst, but ppl have said I could or should go to wall street.	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
84	I completely disagree; anonymity should be for all.	Scoobah	-	3/16/1999
83	Yup, totally agree. Eeven financial planners or whatnot should declare such, i	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
82	Here, "Have you not noticed some of the malicious attacks that have oc	Scoobah	-	3/16/1999
81	You have a point, of course, which is why so many companies keep away from the	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
80	Then you know what I mean by the difference. Chuzz, for example, would stand o	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
79	WHy not correct misapprehensions, but as someone pointed out, a company could b	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
78	Thx for the complement - I've been on the BMCS thd!! No position cureently	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
77	<<<i>I think all posters should use their real names and not hide b	Cisco	-	3/16/1999
76	It may sound elitist, but I have no problem distinguishing between the knowledg	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
75	Not a bad start, I'd say. However, many of those conversations are probabl	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
74	Edwarda, I am all for investment professionals - very likely they will post FAC	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
73	<i>"- are there any that require one's real name to be used?<	Mama Bear	-	3/16/1999
72	oh, ok, I did not know it is/was the anonymity that is the issue - so noted - c	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
71	SI - I would demand you search for multiple accts and for associations between	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999
70	maybe they are being paid, maybe they aren't that isnt the point, the point	Scoobah	-	3/16/1999
69	Message 8339318	Edwarda	-	3/16/1999
68	Schills: are they not paid, in some form? Anyone receiving payment for posting	QuietWon	-	3/16/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):