SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTC
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
990 16 0 INTC
Emcee:  Jules B. Garfunkel Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
940 Jules. Re: "While I continue to believe, as strongly as ever, that IBM'Harry Landsiedel-4/18/1999
939 Thanks Harry, Your, <"Analysts are paid to analyze. You know, go out anJules B. Garfunkel-4/17/1999
938 Jules. Thanx for your suggestions. On another subject, Jules. Re: "WherHarry Landsiedel-4/17/1999
937 Harry, Your, <"My real concern is that prices cannot forever outrun eaJules B. Garfunkel-4/16/1999
936 Jules B. Garfunkel. Re: "Where is the rationality?" Of course, we knHarry Landsiedel-4/14/1999
935 Richard, While in theory, but not extent, I agree with you, I at the same time Jules B. Garfunkel-4/14/1999
934 No, actually my theory is different. My theory is that IBM wines and dines analRichard Forsythe-4/14/1999
933 Harry and All, I find it rather ironic that INTC should be down today, (-3 1/2 Jules B. Garfunkel-4/14/1999
932 February 24, 1999 12:16 Intel Announces Enterprise Technology Center, Chipset Rob C.-2/24/1999
931 Hi Jules, I was wondering about the chances for a "surprise"... LastRichard Forsythe-2/24/1999
930 I seem to recall that Intel indicated (perhaps to the Montgomery Conference) thRichard Forsythe-2/4/1999
929 I just posted this on the Intel thread, but it really belongs on this thread, gJules B. Garfunkel-2/4/1999
928 Richard, Here is what I posted on the IBM thread. From IBM's anemic 8 % grJules B. Garfunkel-1/21/1999
927 Any thoughts on the IBM results? As usual, earnings were really up 2% from lastRichard Forsythe-1/21/1999
926 Jules, check out the two charts I posted on a/d volume. exchange2000.comj g cordes-1/12/1999
925 Jules.. or anyone.. from an email this morning "Aberdeen is predicting thj g cordes-1/12/1999
924 Jim, OT Glad your making money on IBM. At least one of us is. Playing IBM shortJules B. Garfunkel-1/11/1999
923 OT.. I've been taking short lived puts on IBM, my infamous 'chicken'j g cordes-1/11/1999
922 Hi Jim, Well 98 was an expensive year for me. It cost me most of my profits froJules B. Garfunkel-1/11/1999
921 Hi Jules, how are things? That time of year again <g> Hope all is well.j g cordes-1/11/1999
920 Jules, I hope you will post your evaluation of the Intel earning's, after tdave_c-1/11/1999
919 Xeon is available today. The article is discussing processors that will be avaMark Brophy-10/29/1998
918 Thanks Mark, for the link. I don't profess to be a technical whiz, but otheJules B. Garfunkel-10/24/1998
917 EE Times on Merced competition: eet.comMark Brophy-10/24/1998
916 Intel CEO Craig Barrett Files to Sell One-Third of His Holdings Washington, OcNino-10/21/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News