SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10921 222 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Cary Salsberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9746Bill Olstein just on CNBC pumping semis - particularly TQNT.Terry D-4/18/2001
9745Thanks Jay! We always have to sort out company specific issues and not draw brow0z-4/18/2001
9744>> my point was that the street never acts in a very logical manner eitherSarmad Y. Hermiz-4/18/2001
9743Uh, no, you don't want to average the p/e calculated separately for each yeaQ.-4/18/2001
9742Here's an interesting take on RFMD from Tero Kuittnen at TheStreet.com thesorkrious-4/18/2001
9741Richard, my point was that the street never acts in a very logical manner eitherJerome-4/18/2001
9740<i>At any inflection point, the data is likely to be noisy. When it is obvw0z-4/18/2001
9739That's the first time I've seen someone claim that that an argument is wMath Junkie-4/18/2001
9738<i> TER misses by a penny - no visibility </i> And reports a .59 BoPink Minion-4/18/2001
9737Interesting phenomenon *** no visibility....and a probable stock rally for the nJerome-4/18/2001
9736Jerome, good question. I don't know either. You could start with PE and PSR Gottfried-4/18/2001
9735Using a multiple year average does make more sense. Is there an easy way to do tJerome-4/18/2001
9734TER misses by a penny - no visibility dailynews.yahoo.comGottfried-4/18/2001
9733p/e's can be used successfully with cyclical stocks if you average the denomQ.-4/18/2001
9732The problem I have with disregarding P/Es is that at the peak of the bubble, oneMath Junkie-4/17/2001
9731Richard, we all have seen posts where the P.E. is the major metric used in attacJerome-4/17/2001
9730Richard, Yes, P/E as a standalone number is meaningless. P/E with Growth has aIan@SI-4/17/2001
9729<b>"Technology marches ahead. It has no clue whether we're in a bw0z-4/17/2001
9728re: when shorting is so predicatble, it is dangerous. Not all that predictable.Jacob Snyder-4/17/2001
9727Richard, no argument about index derivatives, even though I've never heard aGottfried-4/17/2001
9726Are you saying that PE ratio should not be used as a guide to a stock's valuMath Junkie-4/17/2001
9725John, great article.All thread posters that use the P.E. ratio as a guiding lighJerome-4/17/2001
9724Why is it irrational? Suppose you bought something like DIA, SPY, or QQQ. Why woMath Junkie-4/17/2001
9723John, assigning a single PE to any index would make sense if all its companies mGottfried-4/17/2001
9722That's a great article. Thanks for sharing it. Some questions: Were the NAMath Junkie-4/17/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):