Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

An SI Board Since August 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
10042	15	0

Emcee: brutusdog	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
9842	I take it you do not agree that the Equal Protection Clause arguments were bogus	Nadine Carroll	-	8/2/2001
9841	I completely disagree. And I think the Court's decisive action averted a mu	jlallen	-	8/2/2001
9840	There were four major decisions in Bush v. Gore: 1. the decision to hear the ca	Nadine Carroll	-	8/2/2001
9839	I've read the decision and having had some experience with the law I can not	jlallen	-	8/2/2001
9838	<i>They did the right thing. Federal law was the basis for the decision. J	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9837	They did the right thing. Federal law was the basis for the decision. JLA	jlallen	-	8/1/2001
9836	Adhering to <i>their own</i> principles instead of traducing them wo	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9835	It turns out they were exactly correct. But in any event, the method of "r	jlallen	-	8/1/2001
9834	That's exactly what the USSC did <i>not</i> know when they stopp	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9833	More voters DID NOT vote for Gore in FL. That's the point. JLA	jlallen	-	8/1/2001
9832	Are you telling me that Gore was the "wrong man" even if more Florida	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9831	The wrong man would have been given the office... JLA	jlallen	-	8/1/2001
9830	How?	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9829	All of us as citizens of the US would have been harmed by the way the FLSC wante	jlallen	-	8/1/2001
9828	I read the decision. The Florida court was ruling on state election law. Sure,	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9827	Wrong. The decision was based upon federal law which remains supreme under the	jlallen	-	8/1/2001
9826	The two liberal SC justices who found that the recount was "unfair" we	Nadine Carroll	-	8/1/2001
9825	Ah, yes! Her! Idiot in the first degree!	Lazarus_Long	-	7/31/2001
9824	Wanna see a REAL idiot. Message 16151314	jlallen	-	7/31/2001
9823	There is an idiot in this, JLA. And it isn't Bush. And it isn't you or	Lazarus_Long	-	7/31/2001
9822	As opposed to any other form of government "porkfest"? But you make a	Hawkmoon	-	7/31/2001
9821	This is a very unique case. The decision was The Court found 7-2 that the recoun	jlallen	-	7/31/2001
9820	When decisions are sound, my friend, courts usually don't feel the need to a	Nadine Carroll	-	7/30/2001
9819	<i>How do I "get over" having an openly partisan Supreme Court?&	jlallen	-	7/30/2001
9818	<i>The legitimacy of the election was confirmed by a USSC decision</i&g	Nadine Carroll	-	7/30/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):