SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NSCT
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
113 7 0 NSCT
Emcee:  Philip Armstrong Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
113NSCT has probably moved close to as low as it should go for a while. I would noRob S.-10/9/2000
112I have no feelings about it. It might be informative. I would ask some hard quRob S.-10/7/2000
111I haven't been reading the RB board for a while. What's the feeling aboNancy McKinney-10/7/2000
110Can't blame you. The mood on the SI threads has grown pretty sour lately. Rob S.-10/6/2000
109Decided to escape here from the RB boards. Anybody around today?BlondePsyDoc-10/5/2000
108Thanks for responding to my July 10 post. What we all want are for this companyRob S.-10/4/2000
107Rob S, you seem to have no trust in NSCT management, based on: >Company plaDavid Harker-10/4/2000
106>Telling investors that they will make announcements once >the TMOS patentDavid Harker-10/4/2000
105> if he has been so brilliant and instrumental why hasn't >he helped David Harker-10/4/2000
104Thanks, David. I didn't know.Nancy McKinney-10/3/2000
103Academic. Patents need to be moved to development agreements that generate cashRob S.-10/3/2000
102Raging Bull has a lot of Bullchip postings imo. The reason NSCT stock is down Rob S.-10/3/2000
101>That shareholders' meeting is Oct. 8 in Phoenix. No, it <i>was&lDavid Harker-10/2/2000
100>I discovered one positive develop: the company said it >was able to reduDavid Harker-10/2/2000
99>Investment community doesn't seem impressed with his >replacement: aDavid Harker-10/2/2000
98That shareholders' meeting is Oct. 8 in Phoenix.Nancy McKinney-9/7/2000
97Volume was much higher than normal - that doesn't jive with simple profit taRob S.-9/7/2000
96Looks more like profit taking on a tanking market than anything elseRON BL-9/6/2000
95Shareholders don't like the change in management: biz.yahoo.com James UpchRob S.-9/6/2000
94Dear Shareholders, National Scientific has just received some very exciting newGrandk-8/2/2000
93First annual stockholders' meeting will be Oct. 28 in Phoenix, 5pm at the PoNancy McKinney-7/14/2000
92I can give you an answer just for the first question. The patent was actually gjrsh02-7/11/2000
91The company was supposed to get a patent on the Tunnel CMOS technology but it haRob S.-7/10/2000
90 Merolla, I'm just a stockholder like you - I do not know when they will reaDavid Harker-6/19/2000
89 TO DAVID HARTER; I OWN NSCT I FEEL THE STOCK IS UNDERVALUED AND I'M PLAYINmerolla-6/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News