Should U.S. attempt manned missions to the Moon?

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Should U.S. attempt manned missions to the Moon?

An SI Board Since January 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
41	1	0

Emcee: Edscharp	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
41	I wrote a large post as an edit but it got lost when the edit window ran out.	TimF	-	2/11/2005
40	If its truely random (or at least chaotic and strong pseudo random) I don'	TimF	-	2/10/2005
39	Tim, I did not claim that it being overdue increased the odds in the next X yea	Fangorn	-	2/10/2005
38	If a hit of a certain size happens on the average once every million years, an	TimF	-	2/10/2005
37	Tim, Those time frames are accurate according to the fossil record of such impac	Fangorn	-	2/10/2005
36	<i> Given the near certainty that Earth will be hit by a city killer in th	TimF	-	1/31/2005
35	NASA: Spirit Rover Not Sending Data story.news.yahoo.com NASA: Spirit Rove	Edscharp	-	1/22/2004
34	Bush Creative on NASA Aid nytimes.com By KENNETH CHANG Published: January 15,	Edscharp	-	1/14/2004
33	History Offers Reasons to Be Cautious on Bush's Space Plan nytimes.com By	Edscharp	-	1/14/2004
32	President's Vision Is More Shrewd Than Flashy washingtonpost.com By Kathy	Edscharp	-	1/14/2004
31	Ed, Last word... You are an idiot.	Fangorn	-	1/14/2004
30	Bush to unveil human space plans news.bbc.co.uk By Dr David Whitehouse BBC Ne	Edscharp	-	1/14/2004
29	Fangorn, I guess I'll have to eliminate the possiblity that you were intent	Edscharp	-	1/13/2004
28	Ed, re > I can't understand how come no one else ever thought of th	Fangorn	-	1/13/2004
27	Fangorn, Oooof! It has suddenly occurred to me that either you are completely	Edscharp	-	1/13/2004
26	Ed, Time has become more precious all of a sudden, new project with tight deadli	Fangorn	-	1/13/2004
25	Ed, re >The expense from launching from the moon might be small, but getting	Fangorn	-	1/13/2004
24	Ed, re> If proponents of NASA can effectively make the case that their	Fangorn	-	1/13/2004
23	Ed, re >I naturally assumed you were suggesting that the administration had	Fangorn	-	1/13/2004
22	Fangorn, <I>"I didn't claim that this is Bush's concern [ast	Edscharp	-	1/12/2004
21	Fangorn, <i>"NASA has produced an endless avalanche of revenue to th	Edscharp	-	1/12/2004
20	Fangorn, Even after reading your post I still find, <I>"it's dif	Edscharp	-	1/12/2004
19	Ed, re>But, some questions beg to be asked. Did NASA actually hold patents on	Fangorn	-	1/12/2004
18	Ed, re>If George Bush really has a concern about an asteroid hitting the Eart	Fangorn	-	1/12/2004
17	Ed, re>It's difficult to perceive any tangible economic benefit. <	Fangorn	-	1/12/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):