SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Fiscal Cliff
An SI Board Since November 2012
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9 5 0
Emcee:  HerbVic Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9Pardon the alliteration. No pardon needed, it was good. We have to get our littalanrs-11/16/2012
8How true... Tis sad. Chances are, with the current lack of leadership on both sHerbVic-11/16/2012
7Sure, I'm with you on all of that. A constitutional amendment specifying a alanrs-11/16/2012
6You got it! Congress would still be free to tweak, add and remove entitlements,HerbVic-11/16/2012
5That's not much different than gov get a fixed % of GDP, 20% or something lialanrs-11/16/2012
4I think you misinterpreted the thrust of my question. It has nothing to do withHerbVic-11/16/2012
3"Question: What is wrong with the concept of government operating at a sligalanrs111/15/2012
2Question: What is wrong with the concept of government operating at a slight proHerbVic-11/15/2012
1Under the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Act of 1985, government spendiHerbVic-11/14/2012
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News