SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IS INTC A GROWTH STOCK?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
243 2 0 INTC
Emcee:  Yaacov Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
The investment in INTC has been a rewarding experince for me.
Despite some price volitality, the stock has performed consistantly
well. year after year, and much better than Coke, General Electric,
PEP, etc. the stocks that are considered safe havens for
catious investors. Is INTC is a growth stock capable of performing
in a bear market?

Thanks.

Yaacov
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
243 03/99 from $0.60 to $0.50 on 07/02/97 INTC: BEAR STEARNS decreased estiGlenn D. Rudolph-7/18/1997
242 Glenn that is not a new downgrade. they did it about a week earlier: exchange2AK2004-7/8/1997
241 INTC: MONTGOMERY SEC. decreased estimate for fiscal year ending 12/97 fGlenn D. Rudolph-7/8/1997
240 Yaacov I am a bit sceptical about the merger. It would be a full scale war betAK2004-7/7/1997
239 <i>Thanks for your advice on Black & CO. It seems that INTC is back oGlenn D. Rudolph-7/6/1997
238 Albert, Thank you for your post. What is the update on AMD & CPQ. Is it reYaacov-7/6/1997
237 Glen, Thanks for your advice on Black & CO. It seems that INTC is back on Yaacov-7/6/1997
236 INTC: BLACK & CO. increased estimate for fiscal year ending 12/97 Glenn D. Rudolph-7/4/1997
235 <i>Glenn I assume that the talks are still on though.</i> I believGlenn D. Rudolph-7/3/1997
234 Glenn I assume that the talks are still on though. Thank you for the article -AAK2004-7/3/1997
233 Intel denies Digital patent claims, seeks dismissal Reuters Story - July 03, 1Glenn D. Rudolph-7/3/1997
232 Yaacov take a look at exchange2000.com that talks about intc long squeeze. hAK2004-7/1/1997
231 Albert, Thank you for the psot and the thread. As your aware almost all EurpeaYaacov-7/1/1997
230 Jim I am not sure if I want Intel to be proven at fault. While I am not an IntAK2004-6/30/1997
229 Yaacov it is financed by government. There is also very interesting descriptioAK2004-6/30/1997
228 Albert, I do not think anyone with experience takes any positioning statementsjim kelley-6/30/1997
227 Albert, I did not know that the Germany was financing the project! As you knowYaacov-6/30/1997
226 Yaacov my understanding is that Germany is financing the fab. AMD is extrimly AK2004-6/29/1997
225 Albert, Thanks for the post. Can you expalin to me why among all th places AMDYaacov-6/28/1997
224 Carlos there is a law and there is public opinion. Intel nicely creating an imAK2004-6/28/1997
223 Albert, Almost all lawsuits of this nature are a lose/lose proposition if botKevin-6/27/1997
222 Jim it is bad PR, IMHO, for Intel to say that all DEC's statements are compAK2004-6/27/1997
221 Albert, What is the contradiction? Lawyers take positions but that does not jim kelley-6/27/1997
220 Jim I agree with you. Can't help but comment that it does contradict priorAK2004-6/27/1997
219 RE: DEC/INTC TALKS IMO, it is always better for the disputants to agree in prijim kelley-6/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News