SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
QDEK Quiz for all the daytrader geniuses
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12 0 0 QDEK
Emcee:  Follies Type:  Unmoderated
QDEK jumped 13% today (11/19) on a big increase in volume but the details are very intriguing. Can anyone explain them??

Most of the day QDEK traded in a tight range of 4 3/4 by 4 15/16.

At 14:23:24est a large block of 159900 shares went across at 4 27/32. Doubling the daily volume at that point.

At 14:24:11 another block of 221200 shares went across at 4 27/32.

For the next five mintues, 14 large blocks of decreasing size (58100,47200,...11500,10900) go across all at 4 27/32 all about 25 seconds apart. Only one other trade of 200 shares is made during this period. Total of all the large blocks is 728200 shares ($3.5 mil plus change).

Five minutes after the last large block, the SOES activity starts and there are three SOES trades (1000 shares) at the ask (buyers I presume). The bid is raised and a SOES trading frenzy begins. Only a couple more blocks over 10000 but lots of 1000 and 2000 share lots.

At the end of the day the stock is 5 5/16 by 9/16 up 5/8. Volume is 1735400, doubled since the last large block went across.

So here are the questions....

1) Why did the large block get printed as 16 separate trades? Why are they all decreasing size (except the first)? Why are they all about 25 seconds apart. Were they all done through one market maker or several? Why the same price if several MM's?

2) Was this block sold to or bought from a market maker? Did the market maker buy the block and then try and create activity to drive the price up? or did he sell the block then scrammbled to cover driving the market up after he's short? not likely I think.
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12 My records show it wasn't Merrill who raised the Bid but NAWE raised it to Follies-11/24/1996
11 Would you mind explaining what a Nasdaq Level II is ? How, where and can anyoneAllan Keith Belcher-11/24/1996
10 Ed, Sad but true. There are way too many people who discovered the Internet adwight vickers-11/24/1996
9 That is exactly where the Internet is misleading.... People think they are empoEd Newman-11/24/1996
8 Ed, Any MF manager who held this down to 4 or 5 would be unlikely to still hadwight vickers-11/24/1996
7 Pity the poor Mutual Fund managers who bought this sucker at the end of DecembeEd Newman-11/23/1996
6 So what we are saying here is that the fix is in, right? Someone sold a large Jesse Livermore-11/23/1996
5 Buyers were just trying to get a piece ot the wave before it was over.Robert-11/23/1996
4 Bill, Appreciate your analysis. But how does someone with a large block, of adwight vickers-11/22/1996
3 Dwight- What I believe happened was this. The market had been quiet most of thbill crosby-11/22/1996
2 Bill, Where would Merrill be going with this? Or did they short at 5 1/8 and dwight vickers-11/21/1996
1 Dale- My guess is that this was one mutual fund selling to one mm in blocks as bill crosby-11/20/1996
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):