SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semiconductor and Semi-Equipment Analysts - Their Calls
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
195 24 0
Emcee:  FJB Type:  Unmoderated
The purpose of this thread is to provide a running track record of analyst predictions concerning the semiconductor and semiconductor capital equipment industries. For the sake of discussion, fund managers and market researchers will fall under the title "analyst".
Any discussion of these predictions is encouraged. Why do you think their analysis is wrong? If you think an analyst is an unsavory character and his "out of left field" call cost you money, feel free to vent.

Over time, we will hopefully identify which analysts are accurate and which ones are more qualified for a career in fast food.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
195Anyone follow MSPD?JakeStraw-4/12/2010
194Brian, I think the fear is mainly that this is not the bottom yet, not that goodGottfried-2/25/2001
193I understand it is difficult to invest hard earned money into a stock after it hProud_Infidel-2/25/2001
192Brian, you may be right. I read or skim several financial magazines and most of Gottfried-2/25/2001
191This weekend on CNET's News.com, the lead story was how to reduce portfolio Proud_Infidel-2/25/2001
190At least I have to admit "SELL" is better than neutral or some other rsemi2000-2/14/2001
189Brian, I read AMAT is up AH. Would be funny if WF van K issued a sell at the verGottfried-2/13/2001
188G, <i> looks like WF van Kasper is trying to make a name for themselves&lProud_Infidel-2/13/2001
187Brian, looks like WF van Kasper is trying to make a name for themselves. 02/13/Gottfried-2/13/2001
186Let's remember this call: Applied Materials Cut to 'Sell' at Wells Proud_Infidel-2/13/2001
185Mark Fitzerald (B of A) 06 Feb 2001 Chip equipment shakeout likely as slump hitAlan Gallaspy-2/6/2001
184Monday January 29, 12:32 am Eastern Time Salomon cuts TSMC EPS estimates (UPDATEProud_Infidel-1/29/2001
183Robbie Stephen noe on sector Semiconductor Capital Equipment Sue Billat, SemiJack Hartmann-1/17/2001
182Don't Join This Chip Party By Monica Rivituso January 11, 2001 WE HATE TJack Hartmann-1/11/2001
181Silicon foundry business to grow 18% to 20% in 2001, analyst says By Mark LaPedJack Hartmann-12/26/2000
180Little relief for chipmakers in 2001 Tuesday December 26 01:18 PM ET By Duncan MJack Hartmann-12/26/2000
179Ray, ><i>Since the FED and OPEC in their collective wisdom have essentiGottfried-12/7/2000
178<i>Are you suggesting that INTC doesn't know as much as you as of todasemi_infinite -12/7/2000
177Ray, Are you suggesting that INTC doesn't know as much as you as of today wIan@SI-12/7/2000
176Ian, Seems to me that the 6.5B is based on a set of working assumptions regardisemi_infinite -12/7/2000
175My source was a CNBC graphic. The commentator also mentioned the $5B original eIan@SI-12/7/2000
174Ian, The only comment I saw was: ** Capital spending for 2000 is expected to bFJB-12/7/2000
173Bob, And INTC also raised next year's CAPEX to $6.5B from the prior $6.0B wIan@SI-12/7/2000
17216:26 [INTC] INTEL SEES Q4 GROSS MARGIN PERCENTAGE 63%, PLUS OR MINUS A POINT 16FJB-12/7/2000
171I suppose what seems the most humorous part of the call is that if INTC is goingThe Ox-12/6/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):