SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Predictions - Does Anybody Get It Right?
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
117 7 0
Emcee:  Dale Baker Type:  Moderated
SI is full of predictions about stocks, indexes, commodities, politics, the war on terrorism, sports, you name it.

And most of those predictions are wrong.

Can anyone on SI document a success rate over 50% on any subject? Most of the frequent short-term market forecasters clearly don't cut it.

This is a forum to post when someone gets a prediction right - and when they get it wrong. The only rule is that the prediction and the actual outcome must be clearly linked.

This post on a famous hypester is a good model: Message 16938929

Have fun!
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
117I finally found someone who got it right! ENERGY SPIKES COULD SURPRISE INVESTORDale Baker-6/28/2005
116Looks like the excess liquidity is jumping in ahead of the turnips' expectatDale Baker-3/4/2002
115Here is a quote that puts predictions into perspective: "When you're pDale Baker-2/22/2002
114<I> Why was clownfinger in the news</I> Because he ran his big fat mbenchpress550-2/18/2002
113Hey Dale -- here's a couple of wild predictions from me. Look at the date onChrisJP-2/18/2002
112Dale: Not sure if your goal is to actually find reliable forecasters or to <bbobby beara12/18/2002
111Dale: Not sure if your goal is to actually find reliable forecasters or to ridicthe-phoenix-2/18/2002
110Why was goldfinger in the news? Got a link?At_The_Ask-2/18/2002
109Tell me about this list you have. what have they done?At_The_Ask-2/18/2002
108Maybe the assumption that he was long those stocks is the "oops"Jorj X Mckie-2/18/2002
107Why is that "Oops"?Steve Lee-2/17/2002
106Oops: Message 16325233Dale Baker-2/16/2002
105Actually, on the turnips thread, in the "core", we have some "finZeev Hed-2/9/2002
104The turnips seem to be in tune with the Naz channels again. Once we zig-zag up tDale Baker-2/9/2002
103Dale, in #reply-17024285, I had a small bounce from 1793 and a max low for FebruZeev Hed-2/9/2002
102Did not even notice which thread I was posting on! HankMcNabb Brothers-2/6/2002
101Probably CSCO' CC. Maybe my very negative post on TYC on the turnips thread Zeev Hed-2/6/2002
100Zeev, Futures were up on the S&P and the NAZ in after hours on the CSCO repMcNabb Brothers-2/6/2002
99My worth "damage on this leg is 1757, but I have a nominal turn at 1793, IZeev Hed-2/6/2002
98To give credit where credit is due, your "prediction" on the Naz headiDale Baker-2/6/2002
97WOW - positive GDP for the fourth quarter????????????? Talk about a whole herd Dale Baker-1/30/2002
96Same thoughts on OCCF - nothing surprising in 10K (if you had done your DD). PrREH-1/30/2002
95REH That 10 K read like a horror story about to climax. Got any thoughts now?Fiscally Conservative-1/29/2002
94WHY WHY WHY... AND FOR FREE AT THAT -LOL-<<<< ya fark me, i predictbobby beara-1/29/2002
93WHY WHY WHY... AND FOR FREE AT THAT -LOL- no free lunch is correct but, $99/yead:oug-1/29/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):