SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
FINGER/MATRIX (FINX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
543 0 0 FINX
Emcee:  RONALD H. RUST Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
DID ANYONE GO TO THE RECENT ANNUAL MEETING FOR THIS COMPANY? I UNDERSTAND THEY TALKED ABOUT SOME HIGH POTENTIAL LEADS ON BATA TESTING AND POSSIBLE FUTURE ORDERS.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
543.FEDS' DOUBLE-TAKE By CHRISTOPHER BYRON December 20, 2004 -- IT is entirelStockDung-12/20/2004
542 No sir, they most certainly did not... Assume 50 ecnts, if they are able to getCharles Broderick-11/10/1999
541 i forget, did they ever do the reverse split yet?Green Receipt-11/10/1999
540 Sorry, another p & d just momentum stuff! No dollars!! Designed to put 1 fCharles Broderick-11/10/1999
539 Company Press Release - Looks promising. FingerMatrix Developing Fingerprint-SBoyd Spencer-11/10/1999
538 19:1 came from the IR bloke...nice guy...said that the boss wanted 5mil sharesCharles Broderick-10/3/1999
537 Thank you the correct facts pertaining to the reverse split. In my opinion the swoboda4-10/2/1999
536 Maestro, I am fine. I hope the world is treating you well and that you arRobert C. Petersen-10/2/1999
535 Robert (how have you been?), 19 for 1? That is a very unusual ratio. All I can Zeev Hed-10/2/1999
534 19 for one!Charles Broderick-10/2/1999
533 As I said earlier...they're already planted on RBULL... Getting ready and tCharles Broderick-10/2/1999
532 I know, dont worry, its a gamble...and i would like to think that your writing Charles Broderick-10/2/1999
531 I thought it was a one for nineteen reverse split..the previous one being a oRobert C. Petersen-10/1/1999
530 Unfortunately many people have to learn through experience and it hurts. What Iswoboda4-10/1/1999
529 Swoboda, Usually the next step in this scenario is an urgent need for monRobert C. Petersen-10/1/1999
528 If they are MM's they are doing a very bad job. There is no volume for thisswoboda4-10/1/1999
527 That's why certain MM looking types moved in to strangle comment on RBULL, Charles Broderick-10/1/1999
526 well I'm not a shareholder anymore. (i'll have to check on that. I haveGreen Receipt-10/1/1999
525 Consider this!!! What filings have we, or any other proof, necessary to reasCharles Broderick-10/1/1999
524 we would have used the 'wet platen' in our livescan system had they betGreen Receipt-10/1/1999
523 Its down because of rev split, when it splits it will lose 40% again, and then Charles Broderick-9/30/1999
522 I thought that the new owner was the old owners brother, or some relation. Did Philip Armstrong-9/30/1999
521 Fingermatrix is a company that closed its doors having gone broke last year makCharles Broderick-9/9/1999
520 The reverse that is being proposed now has to do with the way in which the compCharles Broderick-9/8/1999
519 several yrs. ago they had a reverse split and now their doing it again...are thbudej-9/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News