SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
OfficeMax (OMX)- A Steal
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
293 5 0 OMX
Emcee:  Steve Sucheck Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
OfficeMax is trading at 12x earnings with eps growth projected above 30 %. Anyone else following this stock?
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
293 For those of you that overlooked the news release involving echristmastrees.comEric Mason-12/2/1999
292 Thanks for the info, Lebo. Are you sure about that? CEO purchased that many shagrasshopper-11/2/1999
291 >OMX CEO bought 188,000 common shares on Oct. 7, 1999. I guess I'll havRob LeVine-10/17/1999
290 OMX CEO bought 188,000 common shares on Oct. 7, 1999. Hmmmmmm!lebo-10/14/1999
289 Hey thanks, I'll check out RTM also . . . . .. grasshopper p.sp any othegrasshopper-10/14/1999
288 HMMmmmmmmm . . . . . I should look into this SME. Have you any evidence of angrasshopper-10/14/1999
287 If you want to bottom fish get some RTN.a and forget this dog. If RTN don'tJames F. Hopkins-10/13/1999
286 I don't know but I'm not buying..something wrong here that don't meJames F. Hopkins-10/13/1999
285 OK, OK, . . . so I'm bottom fishing, I admit it. OMX seems to be holding grasshopper-10/12/1999
284 It's almost futile to hunt bargains in a falling market, and or when the dJames F. Hopkins-10/1/1999
283 Flirting with the big 5 is very dangerous. Although, I wonder if any institutiAdam Nash-10/1/1999
282 Brutal trading this AM, down to 5, did not increase the position yet Joseph H. Leiti-10/1/1999
281 We are on the same page, on top of that I don't think much of her plans. HeJames F. Hopkins-10/1/1999
280 Buying the stock now is basically a bet that the stock won't cross 5. If iAdam Nash-10/1/1999
279 It's been so long since I posted on her I had forgot, I'm still not bitJames F. Hopkins-10/1/1999
278 All this is very true, But here's a company with 900 stores and 4.5 billionJoseph H. Leiti-9/30/1999
277 I'm just surprised that the stock can trade this low. Investment communityAdam Nash-9/30/1999
276 I'm responding to this topic, hopefully to refresh the topic and maybe someJoseph H. Leiti-9/30/1999
275 This OMX Thread IS sort of QUITE, well that may be a good sign for the stock, James F. Hopkins-3/17/1999
274 Lots of volume and a nice movement so far today! Looks good long term also. IMFuzzy-3/2/1999
273 Market seems to look at it with a positive bias. Now if we can get a steady upJames W. Bradsh-3/2/1999
272 Earnings out, don't look to bad before charges.Fuzzy-3/2/1999
271 You are right, and especially if there is a significant earnings surprise that James W. Bradsh-1/10/1999
270 All it takes is a good quarterly earning report. That should be an excellent prBob Mohebbi-1/9/1999
269 Would agree it may not be a big issue, but I find that those stores that have mJames W. Bradsh-1/9/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News