SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/10/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: Bob Frasca  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Technocrat:

I'd like to express my thanks and gratitude for your effort in doing the research and your generosity for sharing it.

The only thing I'd like to comment on is the statement below:

"B. Brocade has a lot of flexibility since firmware
is pretty easy to change. "

I'd just like to point out that the "soft" part of software means that it can be changed. Firmware, by definition, is firm, i.e. it can't be changed. That said, it is possible that a component could have embedded firmware which could be replaced by a component with "new" firmware. Just for clarification, is this the sort of flexibility you were referring to or were you repeating something someone said to you?

Thank you again for your generosity.

Bob



To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/10/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: Smart_Asset  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Technocrat,

Thanks for sharing!

Here is what may happen to Ancor.

Investor Interest In Secondaries Growing

Full Coverage
Stock Markets

By Cal Mankowski

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Investors who may be annoyed that their broker cannot get them a piece of the latest hot IPO, or initial public offering, might want to take a look at secondary stock deals.

Long a bit of a backwater in the securities markets, the new interest in large offerings of stock in already public companies is linked to the revival of the small-cap and micro-cap sectors, says money manager Bob Kern.

''Historically, when secondaries were announced, it meant increased supply and (the company's) stock came under pressure,'' Kern said in an interview. ''The secondary was done at a price lower than when the secondary was first announced.''

But consider the case of Emulex Corp. (Nasdaq:EMLX - news). When the Costa Mesa, Calif.-based developer and supplier of products that aid data storage announced a public offering of 2.1 million shares in April, the stock was trading in the 30's. The deal priced the stock at $61 a share. Since then, the stock has climbed above $100. It rose 1-7/8 to 105-1/8 Friday, on a day when the Nasdaq Composite index set yet another record, ending at 2,793.07, up 21.21 points, or 0.77 percent.

A similar pattern was seen in secondary deals for HI/FN Inc., a Los Gatos, Calif.-based semiconductor company, and Realty Information Group Inc., a Bethesda, Md.-based commercial real estate information service provider. Friday, HI/FN gained 1/2 to 69-5/8, compared with the price of the secondary offering at 33. And Realty Information, also up 1/2, was at 46, compared with the price of the secondary at 34-1/2.

Kern argues that one of the reasons fund managers have been cool toward smaller stocks is the difficulty of buying or selling the shares in quantity without affecting the price. But now institutional investors have come to embrace the secondary as a way to buy the stock in size.

When public companies sell more stock in the public market, the deals are sometimes referred to as ''follow-on'' deals.

Kern believes the turnaround for small stocks in the second quarter could really set the stage for a significant reallocation of funds ''down market.'' Even a modest reallocation could bring big gains in the stocks.

Kern, who has been investing in small stocks for 30 years, runs Kern Capital Management LLC. The company is outside adviser to two mutual funds in the Fremont Funds group.

The Fremont U.S. Micro-Cap Fund was up 31.1 percent in the second quarter of 1999 in the retail component and up 32.8 percent in its institutional component. The Fremont U.S. Small- Cap Fund was up 17.5 percent. The Micro-Cap Fund has about $320 million in assets and the Small-Cap Fund has nearly $20 million.

Data from Lipper Inc., a Reuters company, shows small-cap stock funds up 15.6 percent for the second quarter, micro-cap funds up 22.0 percent, and mid-cap funds up 12.5 percent. Growth funds were up 7.1 percent. Stock funds embracing all categories were up 10.2 percent.

With more than 5,000 micro-cap stocks in the $10 million to $580 million market-capitalization range (share price times shares outstanding) and another 1,000-plus small caps in the $580 million to $2.7 billion market-cap range, Kern concedes it's more expensive to do the research to sort out the good and the bad. And there are bad companies in the lowest tiers that will not be around a year from now, he agrees. By contrast, the 122 large-cap companies with more than $19.3 billion in market capitalization each have grown that big because they have a history of being successful businesses. The breakdown from large caps to microcaps cited by Kern is based on figures from Market Guide Stockquest.

How do Kern and his team find the right small and micro-cap stocks to buy? For one thing, he is passing up the ''dot-com'' stocks altogether.

''We are investing in the Internet primarily through the 'enablers','' he said, which means companies that have the broadband technologies for faster Internet access or that specialize in such areas as encryption and compression.

A basic strategy at Kern is to avoid ''me-too'' companies with nothing special, unique or innovative in their product or service. Instead, the focus is on the sectors of technology, health care, consumer products and the broad area of services where the innovation is greatest. Although innovation is also taking place in the financial, energy and transportation sectors, Kern argues that it is at a much lower level and he generally looks for special situations in those areas.

Friday, the Dow Jones industrial average and the S&P 500 index also closed at record highs. The Dow rose 66.81 points, or 0.60 percent, to end at a record 11,193.70. For the holiday-shortened week, the Dow was up 54 points. The S&P 500 index added 8.86 points, or 0.64 percent, to close at a record 1,403.28.



To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/10/1999 5:37:00 PM
From: George Dawson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Kurt,

Thanks for outstanding comments on FC and some of the major players. I have been looking at the issue of IP over FC lately and the adapter companies that support IP. The number seems to have grown - so far on my list EMLX, QLGC, and INPH adapters all support IP over FC.

Did you hear anything about IP over FC and zoning that would separate IP from SCSI traffic on the same fabric?

Your comment about cascading switches is right on the money. I would like to know the largest fabric of cascaded switches and also if Ancor's latest generation switch has actually been multistaged.

Thanks again,

George



To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/10/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: Patrick Sharkey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Technocrat, thanks for the information, and the research.

I think that it was Pigboy that posted about the EMC IR discussion, with Seth, not Iceburg.

My own call to EMC IR revealed a claim that EMC would only use the McData switch because it was the only switch that was "fault tolerant."

A call to Data General IR revealed that DG/Clarion would not commit to any one switch maker, but that decisions would be made based upon customer needs, then-existing technology and price points.

Pat



To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/10/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: John E. Mansfield  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Technocrat -

First: excellent post, one of the best I have ever seen.

Second: I firmly believe that some vendors will attempt to push storage fabric logic to the switch while others will attempt to retain it within the storage sub-system. By you comments it appears that brocade is pursuing the first path while Ancor may support the second. If this were to happen, I have a hard time buying into the idea that the switches will be interchangable or even interoperable which leads me to belive single sourcing may become the norm.

Thoughts welcome.

Thanks

john



To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/10/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: Pigboy  Respond to of 29386
 
Thanks Kurt for the GREAT POST!

<< --- Ice, when you asked EMC's IR if they were
using Brocade switches a la McData, are you
sure their denial was not limited to the
mainframe stuff? >>

Yes, i think you were referring to my earlier post.

Message 10400225

And no, I am not sure. I am still a little confused because of Brocade's obvious volume to McData in the past. And it also seems to contradict what Roy Sardina, a knowledgeable FC insider, said a few weeks ago.

Message 10233925

From what eric sahlin posted in here, the EMC SAN cc just ripped on the Brocade switches. I tried calling in to listen, but I think its no longer available. Does anyone know if I can still listen to it? Seems to me though, that if any part of EMC were using Brocade switches (thru Mcdata or not), they wouldn't blast them apart at a cc.

Again, thanks for your time Kurt. Wanted to get your thoughts on Gadzoox and their lower end switching (are they and Vixel still in a WAY lower league than Ancor/Brocade?)? I may try to pick some up next week after the IPO (i believe they are going out tuesday or wednesday but not positive) if they don't open at a gazilion.

Also, John Mansfield, who has been working with EMC for the past several months i believe, envisions (purely speculates) EMC using 8 port switches connected to the HUGE but fault tolerant Mcdata ones. Will EMC need these anytime soon in Your opinion?

cheers,
pigboy



To: Technocrat who wrote (23259)7/11/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: Nancy McKinney  Respond to of 29386
 
Technocrat,
I appreciate your sharing all your DD with us; it was very interesting and I learned much.
Nancy