Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ztect who wrote (9886)	2/13/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: Warren A. Wilbur, Jr.	Respond to of 40688

Hey, Z, I can't believe I say it but I start to actually like you <G> No, I don't think you are naive. Those who believe in this trickle down BS are the naive ones and let's not even start talking about the religous right ...Brrrrr..... Take care !

To: ztect who wrote (9886)	2/13/1999 10:31:00 PM
From: D PARKER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 40688

Z, * THIS IS ALL OT FOR PNLK* I have a great respect for your financial expertise. That being said, I must also say that you and I are not only on different sides of the fence, we are not even playing the same game. Political affiliations have very little to do with what is going on. They are red herrings for the masses. My point of view (please read in order): Message 7801663 Message 7813708 Message 7814194 Message 7815379 Citizen Dave

To: ztect who wrote (9886)	2/13/1999 11:22:00 PM
From: CigarHolder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 40688

(puff, puff) I might as weigh in with my two (humble) cents on the Clinton situation. I guess I should start off ( I shall be succint) that Bill and Hill have an agreement that is widely acknowledged. She puts up with Bill and Bill can boink whomever he wants as long as he remains President (can you name another wife who would put up with his baloney and not get something for it in the end???)Her payoff is a political office ( it was the power of being VP). While I could on and on about how Slick has compromised the Office of the Presidency, and while JFK, Truman, Eisenhower all had trysts, it's always the same; Democrats have sexual scandals and Republicans have $$ Scandals. Bill has NEVER held a paying job that was not on the public dole. He is a career politician. His wife is the brains in the family. In the truest sense, Slick has ALWAYS let his little head rule. By coincidence, most of our USA population is baby boomers. You know, free love, 60's and related. Since they are the majority, the populist view rules among Americans. Hey, groovy, man, so what's a little head? Hey, man, you know, it's cool with the old lady. She digs it man. If ANYONE feels that Slick is "OK", then I feel VERY sorry for you. You have NO morals to pass on. To wit, what;s good for the President, it';s good for your daughter/son. Too harsh, says CH? You bet your bottom PNLK dollar. Bill Clinton is a liar and a "man" with NO integrity. Though legally he's not guilty, he's the WORST piece of white trash I have ever seen. Shakespeare was probably thinking of a guy like Slick. CigarHolder PS. This, of course, is just my HO.

To: ztect who wrote (9886)	2/14/1999 12:47:00 AM
From: Dixie7777	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 40688

Z Please quit the childish and very predictable liberal attempt to always put those you disagree with on the defensive using diversions that have nothing to due with the core issue. Old trick and won't work in the light of day. Are you a extreme right to "lifer"...who goes around on the sly blowing up clinics killing and maiming people who are already alive? If anyone has a right to resent your inferences it would be anyone that is on the receiving end of that repugnant statement. It's beneath your credentials as a professional. For the sake of collegiality I'll elect to ignore the stupidity of your comment and chalk it up to desperation on the part all of those trying to reassemble the dissembler's reputation in order to vindicate their poor judgement in voting for the bastard and then the subsequent betrayal by dirt ball bill. And don't worry, this tiger will show us all that its stripes don't wear off. I'm confident he'll continue to make you proud. Z, the guy was, is and will always be a dirt ball, a coward, an obstructionist, a predator and an accomplished liar. Not necessarily in that order, but when one's resume is so flush with so many adjectives, who cares about the order? From now on if you want to gild the lily, I'd suggest that there's not enough gold in Fort Knox and you'd be better served by dropping the subject and getting back to the things we have in common. PNLK! How bout it? R

To: ztect who wrote (9886)	2/14/1999 2:48:00 AM
From: garz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 40688

never posted but Clinton (President) LIED under oath...and Senators (lawyers) overlooked it...just because of the polls...think about that reality... I (President) solemnly swear (right hand on the Bible) to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. The country's judicial system now, by his acquittal, should have no power to compel a witness to tell the truth...get a dictionary and read definitions to the big words... Clinton must not be concern about the law...nor ztect...What does Hate have to do with it...WAKE UP AMERICA... garz

To: ztect who wrote (9886)	2/16/1999 12:08:00 AM
From: Victor Lazlo	Respond to of 40688

ztect, you do seem to be frail of memory. I guess for me it comes down to two rude, self-important hypocrites who came from a backwater state where they ran fraudlulent land deals (Whitewater, Castle Grande, etc..) to enrich themselves, and in the same backwater state did cattle futures deals and radio phone deals to make lots of money for themselves, and then call the 1980's "the decade of greed." Let's see; then, they tried to take over 7% of the economy with the health care scam, helped along by Ira Magaziner, who you may or may not know, as I do, to be a seven-time public-policy failure. (I knew Ira from his failing Rhode Island days. Did you?) Then Hillary sacked the White House Travel Office and tried to give this business to friends of her friends, the Bloodworth-Thomasans. All the travel office people were acquitted immediately of the false charges the Clintons tried to bring against them. The Clintons and Gores also raised $100's of millions of illegal contributions from foreign sources. And how about Clinton's sale of missile guidance systems to China? China is oppressing Tibet, committing genocide there. How do Clinton's Hollywood friends let this get by?? The Clintons are pure rude hypocryites. We do not need this. Nah, you don't understand at all, ztect. Just go back to sleep, buddy. Democracy will still be safe while you doze....... Victor