SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11833You either haven't noticed or weren't interested in what I've been wRick Julian-5/3/2002
11832Sshwwwittt oooo sorry, had to duck. <i>"The one really special thing one_less-5/3/2002
11831I know people who refuse to consume antibiotics, but will gladly stuff down theiDayuhan-5/3/2002
11830Perhaps more interesting than suffering fools... Good point about results. HerSolon-5/3/2002
11829<i>"At some point, of course, their "spinning" must stop asSolon-5/3/2002
11828<i>I'm interested, Liz, in you sharing one single defining insight youDayuhan-5/3/2002
11827<i>"your posts are laborious reads.</i>" I am sure they aSolon-5/3/2002
11826<i>"You obviously didn't understand the definition of the word &qSolon-5/3/2002
11825I have responded to every challenge you've made to me regarding my thesis, hRick Julian-5/3/2002
11824<i>Suppose all the oil companies in the US were either combined into one oDayuhan-5/3/2002
11823<i> Idiots on Parade</i> BUZZZZT! Wrong! Can't count. It'Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11822OTOH, I have never respected your thinking: as I stated earlier, it is derivativRick Julian-5/2/2002
11821Hey, dork, your the one who came in here spouting the "physics", not mLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11820What is this Idiots on Parade? You obviously didn't understand the definitiRick Julian-5/2/2002
11819Suppose all the oil companies in the US were either combined into one or formed Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11818Coward. Really, seriously, for all your bluster, you are an intellectual coward Rick Julian-5/2/2002
11817I JUST HAD ONE! AN ORIGINAL INSIGHT! You're an ignorant twat who can'tLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11816<i>"I've always respected your mind even when our opinions have dSolon-5/2/2002
11815Now, now, this is your Aunt Lizzie, Karma. You're being nasty. Play nice. Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11814Why are you trying to move it away from your intention as relates to ME justice!Solon-5/2/2002
11813No, you're an evasive host who can't rise to an intellectual challenge. Rick Julian-5/2/2002
11812I feel you have the depth of a mud puddle. de·sert2   PronunciaRick Julian-5/2/2002
11811No, no, no. I'm the host. You're the entertainment. I take it "Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11810<i>"You've been parroting your tired ass, derivative, pedantic, 1Solon-5/2/2002
11809<i>"One of the legitimate functions of gov't in a capitalist counaverage joe-5/2/2002
11808<i>Choosing to violate a natural law doesn't invalidate that law. <Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11807Let's try this instead, Liz. Describe one original line of thought you'Rick Julian-5/2/2002
11806Precisely. And I enjoy discussing such issues immensely. As I just said to someSolon-5/2/2002
11805Glad your backup finally arrived. You were crying uncle this afternoon you dull Rick Julian-5/2/2002
11804Hey, let's get back to physics. Expalin Ampere's Law- -your way, not thLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11803I treasure these moments.average joe-5/2/2002
11802Thank you for pointing that out. I missed that. Karma is a real find. We shouLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11801With all due respect you crusty, doddering, addle brained idiot . There's noRick Julian-5/2/2002
11800<i>"WE'VE GOT THE WINNING ENTRY IN THE "DUMBEST POST OF THE Solon-5/2/2002
11799I CAN'T HELP YOU! I'm laughing so hard it hurts to type! WE'VE GOTLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11798I have no doubt that somewhere on the outer fringe there is a junction point betDayuhan-5/2/2002
11797Do I hurt your feelings, Karma when I expose you for who and what you are? I doSolon-5/2/2002
11796<i>"We are very hard headed creatures (at least that's what my faSolon-5/2/2002
11795<i>I see your point but if they are a big part of the solution you lose alDayuhan-5/2/2002
11794Make sure your Depends are snug, don't want any leakage, Auntie.Rick Julian-5/2/2002
11793<i>"the rate of the velocity of animus extant among the parties involSolon-5/2/2002
11792Ms.Keller? Take a look at this one . . .Rick Julian-5/2/2002
11791<i>"any boundaries that we perceive are misguided human inventions<Solon-5/2/2002
11790<i>"I am quite confident in my native intelligence, and have only recSolon-5/2/2002
11789<i>That is why the economy prospered under his guidance.</i> LetDayuhan-5/2/2002
11788Though your post referenced a narrow and apocryphal authority, it was nevertheleSolon-5/2/2002
11787<i>"Also they use it even where there is no hate or fear.</i>&qSolon-5/2/2002
11786<i>"No my position has pretty much been the same the whole time</iSolon-5/2/2002
11785<i>given enough authority, descends into tyranny. </i> Again and agaTigerPaw-5/2/2002
11784You don't if antitrust law is interpreted and applied properly. That's aLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11783Unbelievable. Appalling.Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11782<i>Better 10,000 bullies than one big one with the strength of 10,000. &TigerPaw-5/2/2002
11781<i>there may be observations that extend beyond that range </i> The TigerPaw-5/2/2002
11780<i>Clinton was fortunate enough to </i> have the integrity to try anTigerPaw-5/2/2002
11779<i>not the colour of the old one that we burnt to clear space for you</Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11778The Stress Defense By BOB HERBERT On the evening of DTimF-5/2/2002
11777<i>"If we can raise animals to eat, we can raise them as weapons. We average joe-5/2/2002
11776<i>I doubt she ever cracked Kant......</i> Quite the contrary - sheaverage joe-5/2/2002
11775You wouldn't know a rational argument if it fell on you in the middle of theBald Eagle-5/2/2002
11774They just make that stuff up for yanqui turistas who would otherwise be bored bymarcos-5/2/2002
11773<i>I personally hate Microsoft because I do think it has gotten so big tLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11772Hey, I thought you told us the formation of independent Canada was all sweetnessLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11771Oh yeah I remember now that little guy standing on the Island yelling: "Bosone_less-5/2/2002
11770<i>"Did anyone else here challenge that number. NO!</i> No. Noone_less-5/2/2002
11769Time to go. See youse guys.......Neocon-5/2/2002
11768If we can raise animals to eat, we can raise them as weapons. We are not supposeNeocon-5/2/2002
11767Another failed attempt at a rational argument.Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11766I have something to ask. Are you, jewel, jlallen, bill and all other right wing Bald Eagle-5/2/2002
11765I would blow one's head up if I saw it in my closet. I think you missed the one_less-5/2/2002
11764Eeyup....Neocon-5/2/2002
11763I have no problem with killing rats merely because they are vermin. Blow them upNeocon-5/2/2002
11762True. Human and otherwise....Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11761Well for instance it is considered ethical to ride your horse into battle even tone_less-5/2/2002
11760Everything raises ethical questions. What did you have in mind?Neocon-5/2/2002
11759I do not like green eggs and cheese, Blue eggs and ham, they do not please, But Neocon-5/2/2002
11758That is true. Ah, the battle field of the future. There is always a copious suppNeocon-5/2/2002
11757You eating green eggs and ham today?one_less-5/2/2002
11756Or cats? Or gnats? Or gnats with hats buzzing around cats?Neocon-5/2/2002
11755You could mount cameras on these things for spying/survailence purposes. You coTimF-5/2/2002
11754Does raise some ethical questions though?one_less-5/2/2002
11753And if rats, why not bats?one_less-5/2/2002
11752Eeyup.....Neocon-5/2/2002
11751Who cares....I heard rats like caves. Nuf said.one_less-5/2/2002
11750Thank you, almighty one, for enlightening us. Previous to this, we were completLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11749Fortunately, it is far from making a rat turn right or left, to making someone pNeocon-5/2/2002
11748"1984" will be a bit late....Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11747Appropriate that's from the Washington Post. I think that's what the liLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11746Very interesting, those just an improved version of operant conditioning. PavlovNeocon-5/2/2002
11745Uh, yes I retract that. That was just line noise. Not what I typed at all.Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11744Well, yes, Johnny Cochran probably knows as much science as you do. Maybe more.Lazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11743oooooo..ooooh risky analogy.one_less-5/2/2002
11742<i>That is an admirable piece of BS.</i> As Johnny Cochran would saRick Julian-5/2/2002
11741<i>can you prove they haven't been sucked into Karma's consciousnLazarus_Long-5/2/2002
11740Rats Turned Into Remote-Controlled Robots Technique's Potential Uses IncludTimF-5/2/2002
11739Probably backing David Bowie on the glockenspiel in his latest tour........Neocon-5/2/2002
11738Seems like it.... All you have to do is either disagree or point out his pomposjlallen-5/2/2002
11737awe, garrrsh..., but I bet you say that to all of us.one_less-5/2/2002
11736Congratulations, you've just joined my list of SI morons.Bald Eagle-5/2/2002
11735Yep. <g>jlallen-5/2/2002
11734Can I safely assume you don't do much criminal defense litigation? -gg-Bill-5/2/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):