SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Gay Marriage
An SI Board Since December 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
187 4 0
Emcee:  epicure Type:  Moderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
12good pointepicure12/21/2004
11The real practical test will be if the Infernal Revenue Service will allow the mcosmicforce12/21/2004
10I don't think they are eager to take a case on this.epicure12/21/2004
9The very most they could have done is dismiss the case for lack of standing, imoredfish12/21/2004
8That could be it. But when there is no comment, you just don't know. If thepicure12/21/2004
7Here's a page on the Texas sodomy law case: abanet.org Imo, the Court declredfish12/21/2004
6The Supremes have been...reticent... elitestv.com U.S. Supreme Court Lets Massepicure12/21/2004
5Need a source for the Supreme Court case law, that's what ultimately counts.redfish12/21/2004
4It makes total sense to me. You can't help what you feel, imo- but you canepicure12/21/2004
3Thanks for the invite. Don't know if i have the time to move to this debate.michael9712312/21/2004
2bidstrup.com a nice summation- although this writer does have a clear agenda whepicure12/21/2004
1We'll see... this is a hot button for a lot of people and the issue may be scosmicforce12/21/2004
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):