SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INSS - International Network Services
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
446 3 0 INSS
Emcee:  Peter Moyer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
121 Looks like INSS just broke through its 50-day MA again on the way down. Last tDale Baker-6/27/1997
120 Phillip, believe it or not, I think it may only be worth $10.cfimx-6/27/1997
119 I guess you do your job well. INSS down 1 1/2 to 24. Not goodPhillip Biffle-6/26/1997
118 when you look at this company, look at the cash flow statements. For a supposedcfimx-6/24/1997
117 At this point, anything would help this tread. The stock has no volume, very lPhillip Biffle-6/24/1997
116 Hey do you want Twister to start trashing INSS? I think I hate it. PS: They lcfimx-6/22/1997
115 ADAMS HARKNESS & HILL 05/19/97 BUY Major Glenn D. Rudolph-6/1/1997
114 To All, Just saw this in the news. MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC issueRick Oehlerking-5/21/1997
113 <i>investing in it. :) Todd How is that for my first smile???</i> Glenn D. Rudolph-5/20/1997
112 Glenn, OK OK Money went to large networking firms which have higher revenue thjoemjo-5/20/1997
111 <i>So INSS didn't go up today because it was missed as money found itGlenn D. Rudolph-5/20/1997
110 Glenn, I believe it is accurate to say there is a general correlation between joemjo-5/20/1997
109 <i>I agree with your opinions. INSS seems to be trading in narrow range iGlenn D. Rudolph-5/20/1997
108 Glenn, I agree with your opinions. INSS seems to be trading in narrow range ijoemjo-5/19/1997
107 <i>Volatility is common, but didn't the three stocks mentioned (COMSGlenn D. Rudolph-5/15/1997
106 Glenn, Which assumption is too optimistic? 1. 99 earnings $.80 2. post 99 growtjoemjo-5/14/1997
105 <i>The market reflects this at half way through the fiscal year giving a Glenn D. Rudolph-5/14/1997
104 Glenn, I agree completely. Post #87 (approxiametely) I put forth some rationaljoemjo-5/14/1997
103 <i>. Here is my new theory. Take the most recent quarterly earnings ($.06Glenn D. Rudolph-5/13/1997
102 Todd, The buys at 18 & 18 1/2 look great, but I also own it at 30 to 35. IPhillip Biffle-5/12/1997
101 Phillip, New info? GTE & CSCO? GTE's buy of BBN? Networking rebound? joemjo-5/12/1997
100 Rick, I don't think anyone else is looking at this stock. At 16, everyone Phillip Biffle-5/7/1997
99 To All, Anyone know why the recent run up? I really like this stuff. How long wRick Oehlerking-5/7/1997
98 Blame on the partial lock-up release agreement maybe! I still wouldn't payJon Huang-5/2/1997
97 TO ANYONE: What happened today???..Looks like we're all sucking wind on thRick Oehlerking-5/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News