SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Pure Atria Corp(PASW) and Rational(RATL) Merger
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
147 0 0 RATL
Emcee:  NASDBULL Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
122 Any clues on what caused the dip today at about 3:30? Both RATL and PASW took joel sherriff-6/4/1997
121 It is a request for more information, which keeps the window of time to look thCzechsinthemail-6/3/1997
120 See where the Department of Justice has requested additional information on theELMOYUNG-6/2/1997
119 The obligitory class action lawsuit is actually viewed as a bullish sign that tKashish King-5/4/1997
118 Yes, I mentioned the possibility of a class action lawsuit. How much a class aMichael Madden-5/2/1997
117 Dime on the dollar, and a distraction for the company. Come on, seriously, PASdavid decamp-5/1/1997
116 Happily, the gap is closing with both stocks moving up. Someone in recent pastjoel sherriff-5/1/1997
115 Well it looks like the gap is starting (again) to close somewhat. I think at tRandy Ellingson-4/30/1997
114 The big difference between Rational and Platinum is that Rational has been extrRich Benjamin-4/27/1997
113 Baird, And don't forget that even if the analysts are momentarily confuseddavid decamp-4/26/1997
112 Baird, and Randy, I agree that the possibility is fascinating. But, did the Rdavid decamp-4/26/1997
111 IMHO, Rational can, and will go higher than $15 given a decent tech market. ThCzechsinthemail-4/26/1997
110 That's pretty interesting. It would be a good confidence-builder if RATL wRandy Ellingson-4/25/1997
109 One other little tidbit worth considering. According to the last report, RATL Czechsinthemail-4/25/1997
108 The weakness in RATL is making PASW an even better buy. The merger looks increCzechsinthemail-4/25/1997
107 I agree Randy, it feels like PASW's rescue ship was the Titanic.joel sherriff-4/24/1997
106 This 'little guy' doesn't feel like a winner today. Now who's Randy Ellingson-4/24/1997
105 Reciprocal options make a merger more likely, but not certain. The CKP-ULTK merLK2-4/24/1997
104 All: some questions. 1 Anyone with the details on the conditions under which tAlex Wulder-4/24/1997
103 The deal is expected to close during the 3rd quarter of Calendar 1997. I don&#Randy Ellingson-4/23/1997
102 Dave, When is this deal going thru? When will it be approved by shareholders? DBuytick-4/23/1997
101 I did a trivial calc based on adding back in the charges for in-process R&Djoel sherriff-4/23/1997
100 How about earnings without charges? The "discount" on PASW is back tRandy Ellingson-4/23/1997
99 ratl Q4 .89 loss vs 10 gain yr ago-dbc news@4:22pmdavep-4/23/1997
98 Not very likely at all. Agreements like this generally have significant penaltCzechsinthemail-4/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):