SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12233what a lovely grub hardly average joeRainy_Day_Woman-5/6/2002
12232As karen has pointed out, at the time of the offense, which took place before 9/E-5/6/2002
12231I feel left out. I can't remember any insults directed at me based on physiLazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12230US Constitution, Section. 3., Clause 1: Treason against the United States,Lazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12229tsk, sorry bout that, Signed, The weenieone_less-5/6/2002
12228What an utter <i>creep</i> she is. Another Ron Kuby.E-5/6/2002
12227She's definitely not mainstream if she really advocates violence against peoLane3-5/6/2002
12226Yes, it was the McFeatters column, which appeared in the Arizona Star the other Lane3-5/6/2002
12225Wall Street loves a crook, says Buffett By Martin Strydom (FLazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12224I think you're right that treason isn't the charge. I found this. Maybe E-5/6/2002
12223<i>We spend way too much in the US protecting and restoring beaches.</iaverage joe-5/6/2002
12222<i>Here is an interesting story on the machinations behind modern science.Lane3-5/6/2002
12221Thames you should think about how you will end up yourself. What are you really average joe-5/6/2002
12220I'm glad to see that the Brits understand that you have to let nature take iLane3-5/6/2002
12219Have you anything relevant in reply to my post? (LOL, the evidence of the past wthames_sider-5/6/2002
12218Yes, I use large fonts. The smallest font I can reasonably see is what IE callsLane3-5/6/2002
12217Here is an interesting story on the machinations behind modern science. BTW If yaverage joe-5/6/2002
12216Sorry I took so long responding to this. I've been overwhelmed with businessjttmab-5/6/2002
12215Ironic that Britain is about to sink into the same sea that made her great so maaverage joe-5/6/2002
12214LOL! Me either... Signed, Mr. Toad....jlallen-5/6/2002
12213Yes, a 15 inch LCD might have almost as much viewable area as a 17 inch monitor TimF-5/6/2002
12212I never forget an insult based on physical unattractiveness, believe me. :-)Poet-5/6/2002
12211I figured that. -gg- Anyway I trust you won't forget that Mrs. Peel and I fBill-5/6/2002
12210I used the word "unfortunately" because she was relying on him to pleaPoet-5/6/2002
12209<I><< Unfortunately he didn't come off well either. >><Bill-5/6/2002
12208<i>Even Curie was ridiculed for the experiments that led to the discovery thames_sider-5/6/2002
12207All this talk about Bush, Gore, and Quayle last evening and nary a word about AsLane3-5/6/2002
12206I had a good week as a poet, as a matter of fact: two publications and first priPoet-5/6/2002
12205And coming from a Poet,thanx :-)D.Austin-5/6/2002
12204She sucks as a lawyer. The first rule of good lawyering is never to become persojlallen-5/6/2002
12203That was very poetic. I'm impressed! <I>To talk about the weather isPoet-5/6/2002
12202Oh yes Poet; To be on ignore is one thing but selective interruption is another.D.Austin-5/6/2002
12201<i> She's a frigging traitor, imo. </i> I don't think that&Lane3-5/6/2002
12200<i>1600x1200 is nice. How big of monitor do you have?</i> I have a Lane3-5/6/2002
12199<i>Consider this my handshake, please.</i> Back atcha. Closure is Lane3-5/6/2002
121981600x1200 is nice. How big of monitor do you have? TimTimF-5/6/2002
12197It wasn't even coded, as I understood it, although some info could have beenE-5/6/2002
12196No, CL is two places below us! 'Night all. It's been fun.E-5/6/2002
12195I agree about the traitor thing. Kuby was making fun of the idea she might havePoet-5/6/2002
12194Computer Learning is on the Hot List at #9- -one place above us. Must be a BAAALazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12193Cheney, Rice, Rumsfield, Powell, ..... Feel better?Lazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12192Please tell me he has puppete I mean helpers. Smart ones. Please.E-5/6/2002
12191I agree. She's a frigging traitor, imo. And she can't be a good lawyer, E-5/6/2002
12190Mike Wallace interviewed. She said all her advisors and friends advised her agaPoet-5/6/2002
12189Shaddup. Just shaddup. That's enough out of you, young lady! You can sleeLazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12188What happened ? I forgot to program the VCR to catch it.Lazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12187I'd like to thank you and Neocon for your kind explication of our president&E-5/6/2002
12186Apparently some guy named Reynoldsburg Ohio said that. Hey! You're way, waLazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12185Do I get to include boreisms and woodenisms? You won't have a chance. <Lazarus_Long-5/6/2002
12184Time to pack it in. Unusual to be here at this time anyway. It has been real. SwNeocon-5/6/2002
12183There are a few ways in which something might be considered a pseudo- science. ONeocon-5/6/2002
12182I am happy with Bush. He has come through where it counts.....Neocon-5/6/2002
12181Ten and nine reflect more on the compiler than on Bush....7 through 5 are meaninNeocon-5/6/2002
12180omg omg omg you ask so littleE-5/6/2002
12179Dubya makes Jack Handey look like a malapropism hack.Poet-5/6/2002
12178Okay, just this one then I'll stop: Top 11 Reason Bush Winned the ElectionaE-5/6/2002
12177This is funny, too. Well, to me, anyway: Top 11 reasons references to Saudi AraE-5/6/2002
12176Uh huh. He's just fatigued. Anyone could see that, and everyone misspeaks frE-5/6/2002
12175<i>"The whole point of science is that it is proven or provable."one_less-5/6/2002
12174I think those are rather trivial, and somewhat sweet. Yes, it is of profound impNeocon-5/6/2002
12173I don't think I'll ever completely understand your actions, nor you minePoet-5/6/2002
12172Hi, E. I take a philosophical attitude to most such malapropisms. I think it goeNeocon-5/6/2002
12171Oh, I can't resist just three more. "There's nothing more deep thaE-5/6/2002
12170Hi, Neo. This is so much fun! --because I am in no way a Gore fan, and sincerelyE-5/6/2002
12169Here is something from a responsible website: <i>WOULD PEOPLE PLEASE STOPNeocon-5/6/2002
12168"I think if you know what you believe, it makes it a lot easier to answer qE-5/6/2002
12167You want a contest of Gorisms and Bushisms, you are just soooooooooooo going to E-5/6/2002
12166By most indices, we are in the early stages of recovery. In any event, the bubblNeocon-5/5/2002
12165I'M BAAAAAACK! "a long waiting line before they could get a biopsy or,Lazarus_Long-5/5/2002
12164<i>Oops. I should have added that I'm not interested in getting neck-dLane3-5/5/2002
12163Science and religion have a lot of common ground in that both are trying to sellaverage joe-5/5/2002
12162I wish I had your self-restraint. -g See you tomorrow.Poet-5/5/2002
12161Fine , we all have our opinions.Ish-5/5/2002
12160The pseudoscience topic made me go out and dig up a book review on the topic of Win Smith-5/5/2002
12159Helping my son with his homework and need to be online for some..... Otherwise,jlallen-5/5/2002
12158Oops. I should have added that I'm not interested in getting neck-deep in tPoet-5/5/2002
12157The thing that strikes me about pseudoscience is the speed at which it has becomDayuhan-5/5/2002
12156Where are the Gore ones? I don't see any attributed to him. I see what is deE-5/5/2002
12155<<We'll blame all those Gore quotes AND all those Bush quotes on QuaylE-5/5/2002
12154It is, isn't it? I laughed out loud when I thought of what I was going to doE-5/5/2002
12153Hi Karen, Sorry for the delay in responding. I haven't been very comfortabPoet-5/5/2002
12152This is all I know: May 4, 2002 Burying Valleys, Poisoning Streams Late yesteE-5/5/2002
12151Well, then we're even. We've got about as many Gore gaffes as Bush missLazarus_Long-5/5/2002
12150Here's how you solve that Select/Copy problem in Netscape: Message 17425766Lazarus_Long-5/5/2002
12149<i>"If you are not expert in a certain science, you rely on the experaverage joe-5/5/2002
12148I did some thinking on evolution in high school. Got invited to a creation vs evIsh-5/5/2002
12147Hey! What are you doing posting on a Sunday night?Poet-5/5/2002
12146Are you trying to cause trouble? Huh? Look, we gave you Nixon, you gave us CliLazarus_Long-5/5/2002
12145<i>If you don't understand the process behind the discovery and manufaLane3-5/5/2002
12144<i>"Just because some scientists may be corrupt, it doesn't changaverage joe-5/5/2002
12143Just because some scientists may be corrupt, it doesn't change the nature ofLane3-5/5/2002
12142<i>"Isn't faith in science an oxymoron?"</i> If you aaverage joe-5/5/2002
12141ROFL! Veddy funny....!!!jlallen-5/5/2002
12140Whoa!!! Without regard to sense or relevance is TP's style. I just happen tjlallen-5/5/2002
12139You mean truth..... He is foul however....jlallen-5/5/2002
12138Thanks!!Ish-5/5/2002
12137<<I seem to recall reading a couple of days ago that Bush authorized the dIsh-5/5/2002
12136<i>Darn if I know what my screen settings are.</i> Start / SettingsLane3-5/5/2002
12135I'm not an expert on Gore and his environmental positions. Are you saying BuE-5/5/2002
12134<i>Blind faith in anything including modern science, pseudoscience or reliLane3-5/5/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):