SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12433Quality Agatha Christie, from the days when her books still had plots and characthames_sider-5/8/2002
12432<i>I think it might even be possible to be tepid on Zionism without being thames_sider-5/8/2002
12431Very civilised, thank you. Genuinely, I'm unlikely to call someone here a &thames_sider-5/8/2002
12430Neo, you're just plain wrong. WRONG. There is minimal anti-semitism in Eurthames_sider-5/8/2002
12429<i>He's not the only one who can't explain why it happened the firLazarus_Long-5/8/2002
12428N? M? Tommy? Tuppence? What ARE you talking about?Lazarus_Long-5/8/2002
12427Well, all right, we'll take out a few other nations in the area if you insisLazarus_Long-5/8/2002
12426<i>Everyone in my family is an insomniac. </i> Are they all internetLazarus_Long-5/8/2002
12425<<She got $2 million when it was sold.>> Good for her. That must hWTMHouston-5/8/2002
12424I wouldn't dare! After all, he did a great job (once again) and he does a coConstant Reader-5/7/2002
12423Have you suggested he call you when he's got it down pat?E-5/7/2002
12422Thank you! Yes, you may. And the cardiologist does, too! Of course, he said thatConstant Reader-5/7/2002
12421I am going to bed early tonight because of leaving in the morning for some well E-5/7/2002
12420Okay. But I can say that you are FINE now. *Smooch*E-5/7/2002
12419Probably would, but if her measurements are as inflated as the number of Iraqis Constant Reader-5/7/2002
12418N or M? Never thought that Agatha Christie title would cause a scandal. Where Constant Reader-5/7/2002
12417I presume that's N? Or do we have another scandal brewing here? :-) You kLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12416That's very funny. I just shouted it into the next room and got a good laughE-5/7/2002
12415Yes. No. Maybe so.Constant Reader-5/7/2002
12414You should be ashamed of yourself, fella. <i>I'm</i> certainly aE-5/7/2002
12413AND I bet it would work! Better stay clear of this thread. The carnage has beeLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12412Nice try! Very nice, indeed.Constant Reader-5/7/2002
12411What is that noun that means "a state of agitation, excitement, or confusioConstant Reader-5/7/2002
12410President Bush and Colin Powell are sitting in a bar. A guy walks in and asks thLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12409Someone posted that to me in a PM. Do you have comprehension problems, maried? E-5/7/2002
12408<i>Oh dear. That is harsh. CH hasn't done anything to justify THAT commaried.-5/7/2002
12407Everybody's different. My husband wouldn't allow me to be chased away orE-5/7/2002
12406E, I am beginning to think I have to take it easy on you... Frankly, your post J. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12405Oh dear. That is <i>harsh.</i> CH hasn't done anything to justifE-5/7/2002
12404Ted Bundy was a nice guy once.Ish-5/7/2002
12403He didn't used to be a bad person, so I think there is something weird goingE-5/7/2002
12402Who is this CH that is such a bad person?Ish-5/7/2002
12401<<Hmmm... I'd almost forgotten Jill. Do you think that being "hunIsh-5/7/2002
12400That's a sick looking chart. And a sick looking profile.Lazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12399I can say exactly the same thing. My inbox would discomfit you in your defense oE-5/7/2002
12398Touche' .... LOL !J. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12397<i>Perhaps his inbox is full of congratulatory PMs?</i> I wouldnJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12396<i>Do you think that being "hung, drawn and quartered" would havLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12395Hmmm... I'd almost forgotten Jill. Do you think that being "hung, drawJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12394lol liabilities . thats a big word.) while rome burns! finance.yahoo.comJHP-5/7/2002
12393Well, I'm probably not as suspicious as you are... The main reason is that J. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12392<i>Was it "improper" for you to quiz me on my opinions of sex acLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12391I believe I was posting to Jewel when you introduced yourself into the conversatE-5/7/2002
12390I might be within a mile of Danny's place this summer. You want to give him Ish-5/7/2002
12389<<Is it reasonable to assume that people who order coffee know that it is Ish-5/7/2002
12388You are beating this poor horse into an unrecognizable corpse. The language youJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12387Oh, silly me, I assumed that since we were talking about Poet, you were talking E-5/7/2002
12386I was arguing that there does seem to be a remote connection with Poets suspensione_less-5/7/2002
12385Jewel, I don't want to be difficult here ... but I just don't see the J. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12384(Groan) I was implying NOTHING about Poet. I was talking about "some peoplJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12383Here is another item from the TOU. Additional to the one about dual accounts, I E-5/7/2002
12382Thomas Friedman also said something interesting about the internet when he was oLane3-5/7/2002
12381<i>"What I failed to do was to see any remote connection..."<one_less-5/7/2002
12380You are implying something unpleasant about Poet, I see, but what that might be,E-5/7/2002
12379<i>Some are because it strikes a person as a fun thing to do.</i> GJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12378Opposition to Sharon's policies, if it is measured, non- hysterical, and ackNeocon-5/7/2002
12377Some second accounts are for stock manipulation. You must know that. Some are foE-5/7/2002
12376<i>Criticism of Israel, and of Sharon, which seem to me to equate militaryLane3-5/7/2002
12375<i>Some are done for nefarious reasons, some as a lark.</i> That isJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12374Which of the fruits on this thread would you like? :-)Lazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12373All right, all right, I retract. A quick look at your profile didn't turn uLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12372"The work of the police, like that of women, is never over." --voice-oTom Clarke-5/7/2002
12371My hand to God, it was delicious. You should be so lucky.....Neocon-5/7/2002
12370LOL! Perhaps not.....Neocon-5/7/2002
12369Ask Jeff. In a previous incident under Admin Bob, it appears IP addresses playeLazarus_Long-5/7/2002
12368I think you have hit on the key issue. I do not think, however, that most peopleNeocon-5/7/2002
12367gonif...Tom Clarke-5/7/2002
12366Substitute "underestimate" for "understand" in that post youjlallen-5/7/2002
12365Ultimately, you are right. I just thought it might be worth a little back and foNeocon-5/7/2002
12364And I disagree.... I think the cyber medium requires new ways of looking at thejlallen-5/7/2002
12363I didn't say it was a cinch, just that it was plausible. Sure, there are couNeocon-5/7/2002
12362Stalking is a stealthy, secretive activity. I simply do not see how it can be dJ. C. Dithers-5/7/2002
12361I saw that. You better run for the hills, if Mrs Peel the grub etiquette arbitraone_less-5/7/2002
12360Pretty yummy.....Hakuna matata......Neocon-5/7/2002
12359You left out a couple of aspects related to the reasonable human presumption thaone_less-5/7/2002
12358GREAT!jlallen-5/7/2002
12357I have learned it is best not to understand the creativity of my brethren in fasjlallen-5/7/2002
12356Do you not believe that there are some hazzards in life that the individual shoudave rose-5/7/2002
12355I've been eyeballing that all morning Well, not ALL morning <Hank KimbalTom Clarke-5/7/2002
12354Sorry......OH WOW, I GOT a sequential grub! I wonder how it tastes......Neocon-5/7/2002
12353No problem.....Neocon-5/7/2002
12352Of course you didn't notice. That is what is so galling....Tom Clarke-5/7/2002
12351I explained the line of reasoning. Show me were it is wrong......Neocon-5/7/2002
12350Sorry for dredging into personal histories. Just trying to illustrate the differone_less-5/7/2002
12349I hadn't even noticed.....Neocon-5/7/2002
12348<<<The claim against McDonalds had some plausibility.>> Come on dave rose-5/7/2002
12347That grub was MINE!! I'm taking it anyway <b>12345</b>Tom Clarke-5/7/2002
12346.Tom Clarke-5/7/2002
12345The claim against McDonalds had some plausibility. After all, the possibility ofNeocon-5/7/2002
12344Hey how ya doin? Just had a nice linguini and artichoke lunch....Tom Clarke-5/7/2002
12343<i>I think it would be a huge stretch to argue that you could ever be heldjlallen-5/7/2002
12342Pim Fortuyn, martyr. We will not be able to gauge the full impact of Pim FortTom Clarke-5/7/2002
12341<i>"I don't think you can cyber-stalk an anonymous alias."&lone_less-5/7/2002
12340Andrew Sullivan responds CHRIS PATTEN'S BLATHER: There are few more condescTom Clarke-5/7/2002
12339Dangerous? How so? He was no Le Pen. The things said about him in the media didnTom Clarke-5/7/2002
12338The first premise is this: undermining American support for Israel amounts to inNeocon-5/7/2002
12337Don't agree with what? She violated the TOU. There are more and less seriE-5/7/2002
12336I was speaking hypothetically, but I don't believe that particular "alijlallen-5/7/2002
12335CH knows Poet's real name, as do many of us, including anyone who has emaileE-5/7/2002
12334Neo, there was a discussion about anti-Semitism here not too long ago. I wonderLane3-5/7/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):