SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1262Can I interest you in a bridge between CSCO and where it was 5/7/02. ConstructiMechanicalMethod-5/15/2002
1261LOL! Brooke, maybe it's not too late for me. Do they have any nice bridgesajtj99-5/14/2002
1260Yes, there was a buy signal of sorts Friday, but there were also buy signals earTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1259Last Friday was a particularly clear set-up because of the higher high in the VXPaul Shread-5/14/2002
1258I'm surprised that so few subscribers have thanked me for recommending KabulTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1257I've tried it, Paul. The problem is that the biggest moves seem to occur at TechTrader42-5/14/2002
1256ST Naz CI: 62.145 MT Naz CI: 52.158 LT Naz CI: 53.239 ST S&P CI: 100.000 MTTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1255As a philosophical point, when the CIs get so low that it's obvious that thePaul Shread-5/14/2002
1254ST Naz CI: 55.142 MT Naz CI: 46.280 LT Naz CI: 48.587 ST S&P CI: 100.000 MTTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1253I assigned that project to AMAT, Triffin, and we'll see how they did with itTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1252Brookster .. Are you still working on this project ?? or did you 'scrap'Triffin-5/14/2002
1251Everyone at CNBC is above reproach." wonder if that was why they hired hiMonty Lenard-5/14/2002
1250'Money Honey' & Cramer: nypost.comTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1249Brooke, did look at the mm's after I sent that first one and I agree. We wiMonty Lenard-5/14/2002
1248You might want to look at the MM-type levels with that one, Monty. It's beenTechTrader42-5/14/2002
1247Look at MMM. I think that is the signal I have been looking for if it holds thaMonty Lenard-5/14/2002
1246The 50 SMA looks like an interesting resistance area for WMT. ST Naz CI: 54.25TechTrader42-5/14/2002
1245TXN and WMT has some interesting charts. BTW, watch the inverted hammer on VXN Monty Lenard-5/14/2002
1244A funny thing happened on the way to options expiration: ST Naz CI: 45.833 42.6TechTrader42-5/14/2002
1243The CI's are still moving up, so the buy based on direction is still good: TechTrader42-5/14/2002
1242LOL...everyone trying to catch the bottom. MontyMonty Lenard-5/14/2002
1241Bob, just watching this craziness. Trading the q's occassionally. MontyMonty Lenard-5/14/2002
1240btw, how are you? do you still AIM anything... I finally gave it up for the CIbob wallace-5/14/2002
1239if it ends up like it looks like it will, we could have another CI sell by the ebob wallace-5/14/2002
1238Hi Bob, Just MHO but I think you would be safe selling a bit more into this. :-Monty Lenard-5/14/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News