SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer
An SI Board Since May 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2121 25 0
Emcee:  davidk555 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
1371Sir R... If you consider that a personal attack, I suggest you have you knees cyaetmo10/5/2007
1370"Hearsay?" Excuse me, I didn't know this was a court of law. SorrHoney_Bee10/5/2007
1369<i>There's a lot of speculation going on here in the absence of facts.queenleah10/5/2007
1368<i>Do YOU have anything of your own personal knowledge other than what Jamqueenleah10/5/2007
1367Ms. honey, first of all, I am not your witness, and secondly, you're still aqueenleah10/5/2007
1366There's a lot of speculation going on here in the absence of facts. In partiMath Junkie10/5/2007
1365Are you a lawyer? "<i>Second I have in my hand here copies of severaMath Junkie10/5/2007
1364Dear Ms. honeybeerose, PMFJI, but I strongly believe that Mr. Hulbert (being thEQ 10/5/2007
1363Ms. Queen...I am sorry that I have not been successful in making "clear&quoHoney_Bee10/5/2007
1362InvesTing Speaking of lawyers I would like to represent Dr. James in his case wjoefromspringfield10/5/2007
1361Ms. Queenleah, just one more (one more) ;) thing: Here is one other article rEQ 10/5/2007
1360Ms. Queenleah, one more thing: A verdict was rendered yesterday in an interestiEQ 10/5/2007
1359honey said to queen: <i>In light of the fact that the Bob Brinkers cancelequeenleah10/5/2007
1358Ms. Queen, In light of the fact that the Bob Brinkers canceled Dr. James’ subHoney_Bee10/5/2007
1357Quatro said: >> If the Brinker charges are true [re James' alleged &quEQ 10/5/2007
1356Joefromspringfield said: >> Queen >> Why are you asking EQ for legalEQ 10/5/2007
1355All this reminds me of the lawyer who has a miscreant for a client and says: &qInvesTing10/5/2007
1354"<i>From here forward, I'll consider you the Queen of the OstrichMath Junkie10/5/2007
1353Honey, the responses from the other side has been sooooh predictable. [graphicyaetmo10/5/2007
1352Joe asked queen: <i>Why are you asking EQ for legal advice?</i> I wqueenleah10/5/2007
1351<i>Ms Queen...would you have any problem with the Bob Brinker's (sic) queenleah10/5/2007
1350Queen Why are you asking EQ for legal advice? I don't think he is a lawyer.joefromspringfield10/5/2007
1349Ms Queen...would you have any problem with the Bob Brinker's canceling that Honey_Bee10/5/2007
1348<i>If the Brinker charges are true [re James' alleged "sharing&ququeenleah10/4/2007
1347<i>Ms. Queen...so you are not at all surprised that the Bob Brinker's queenleah10/4/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):