SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
14533Probably the only President who didn't engage in this was Geo Washington. ALazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14532I want to retract my statement. Otherwise every Tejan on the site will be on meLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14531LOL! Actually, I think he'd put it in downtown San Francisco. Accomplish mLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14530<i>Caught the Marlin and diarrhea. </i> Got a twofer, eh? Cause EVERLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14529Go go go. Go ahead. You're <i>dying</i> post the Quayle quotesLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14528Just be glad he didn't place the national nuclear waste dump in your back yaConstant Reader-6/8/2002
14527<i>I believe it is called shoring up support in key states among swing votLane3-6/8/2002
14526<i>What's more, we have beaujtiful coastline here, not those mudflats Lane3-6/8/2002
14525It's the Japanese long liners that kill everything in the seas. It used to bIsh-6/8/2002
14524"Hernan Cortes didn't conquer Mexico: it was just one stroke of bastaLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14523<i>It's a you'reonetoo argument....Dno't worry about the mote E-6/8/2002
14522Sure it does. Now we know how people in other states, oft-ignored for electoral Constant Reader-6/8/2002
14521<i> I can't believe that he doesn't know CA doesn't want offLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14520Still pisses you off if you're one of the ones being thrown over the side. Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14519<i>it's a quickchangeofsubject </i> IS NOT! It's a you'Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14518<i>pretty run-of-the-mill mistakes. </i> Adding an e to potato is rE-6/8/2002
14517OK....Neocon-6/8/2002
14516I noted a number of things, but will leave it at that.E-6/8/2002
14515Do you remember the <i>Quayle Quarterly</i>? It was always a delightConstant Reader-6/8/2002
14514I believe it is called shoring up support in key states among swing voters with Constant Reader-6/8/2002
14513<i> Does it appear to you that Bush has it in for CA? First there was the Lane3-6/8/2002
14512You are right, I said that it did have an innocuous explanation, which it does. Neocon-6/8/2002
14511Just joking about Quayle. He's as relevant as Clinton. Sure C was a good taE-6/8/2002
14510I thought you brought it up as an example of an anecdote not that 'could'E-6/8/2002
14509No kidding? Well, maybe they regulate deep sea fishing a lot, nowadays......Neocon-6/8/2002
14508White Marlin are nearing extinction. Some say there won't be a breedable popIsh-6/8/2002
14507Did you know that Ocean City, Maryland (near Assateague Island) boasts that it iNeocon-6/8/2002
14506<i>What about Quayle, don't you want some VP quotes? </i> Look, Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14505Went down to Cabo San Lucas in '85. Caught the Marlin and diarrhea. Still haIsh-6/8/2002
14504You should have a shot at this. The second para. Message 17576707Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14503LOL! Where did you get the Marlin?Neocon-6/8/2002
14502I thought you didn't want to discuss it further? Yes, there are incidents thNeocon-6/8/2002
14501Quite possible he wasn't. It's fairly normal for people's speech anLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14500I knew you wouldn't go for it. The that-was-then-this-is-now ex President isE-6/8/2002
14499It looks like bait hanging in front of my 180 pound Marlin.Ish-6/8/2002
14498<i>I remember one person making a big deal out of Reagan's failure to E-6/8/2002
14497LOL! OK, I think I misunderstood your intent and may have misled you with the &Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14496Yes, I know it took place at the boarding school. The main thing is that they haNeocon-6/8/2002
14495I guess I can see that. Reasonable pride.....Neocon-6/8/2002
14494I apologize for claiming that you had a manly physique or rippling muscles. YThe Philosopher-6/8/2002
14493Yes, but you were lying, so apparently even thinking about him was enough. :-) Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14492Hey, wait a minute! That was supposed to be a joke! I see I forgot to put the Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14491<i>Then again, people with a great deal of comfort and accommodation (ie pE-6/8/2002
14490<i>. I remember one person making a big deal out of Reagan's failure tE-6/8/2002
14489I think specific incidents of no importance of their own often become important E-6/8/2002
14488Now, <i>that's</i> hard to believe! I met Clinton once and he E-6/8/2002
14487It's a deal. I assume I can post articles on current events if I don't cE-6/8/2002
14486<i>I do believe that JLA met them both and gave them both high marks for iLane3-6/8/2002
14485Let's make a deal: For the next 7 years you don't mention Bush. And ILazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14484Not writing a check is "rioting"? I think not. Actually, assuming a Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14483Cancel that last post. E thinks you were joking. You should thank the lady forLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14482Oh, just because CH says dumb things... imo you're overreacting. The obsessiE-6/8/2002
14481Just can't handle peace, eh? Got to start a war? OK. In the words of yourLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14480<i>What is it you don't want me to mention about your prez?</i> The Philosopher-6/8/2002
14479Ah.The Philosopher-6/8/2002
14478She must be obsessed with you. That's what it is. But after all, if you wiThe Philosopher-6/8/2002
14477Never mind. Not important.Constant Reader-6/8/2002
14476What is it you don't want me to mention about your prez? I won't mentionE-6/8/2002
14475No, that's a misunderstanding. JLA has met, personally, both Bush and QuaylE-6/8/2002
14474I, for example, used to contribute to the United Negro College Fund. Since I saE-6/8/2002
14473That's exactly what I mean.E-6/7/2002
14472How?Lazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14471You know what? You're harassing me. And stalking me. I'm going to getLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14470jla and Quayle look alike? Why am I not surprised by that?The Philosopher-6/7/2002
14469I agree. "Every action brings about an equal and opposite reaction" spConstant Reader-6/7/2002
14468They have their ways of protesting, white people do. The black community's rE-6/7/2002
14467Well 10 pound and hanging on the wall.Ish-6/7/2002
14466<<I think that anyone in their right mind (who paid the least bit of attenIsh-6/7/2002
14465I'm sure you're right. It couldn't be natural, in a President of theE-6/7/2002
14464Probably all of this is the result of a liberal media hatchet job. I bet they mLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14463Well, hehe, I do believe that JLA met them both and gave them both high marks foE-6/7/2002
14462Yeah. If you give us grief about bringing up Clinton, WAIT UNTIL <b>YOU&lLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14461Shaddup and stick your head back up your butt.Lazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14460I like your frankness! At least you aren't under any illusions, apparently. E-6/7/2002
14459And you got the thoughtless President for those who think less. Junior is just TigerPaw-6/7/2002
14458ACTUALLY, if you don't have one, you should get one set up. It can considerLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14457The snicker was with a straight face. < GUFFAW!! >Lazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14456After Slick Willie, ANY Republican is better than Slick's successor. We woulLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14455Told you you couldn't say it with a straight face. ~snicker back~E-6/7/2002
14454All right. Bush isn't lying. <snicker!>Lazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14453Now, you weren't changing the subject to the irrelevant past because the preE-6/7/2002
14452Any case against a Kennedy in Mass is "thin". It's just amazing tLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14451But Rice covered didn't she? Do you think Clinton's advisors helped whiLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14450I noticed it, you silly. I almost said that the word for August in the manual foE-6/7/2002
14449Oh, instead, let's listen to that adult you are so proud of, the President oE-6/7/2002
14448Yeah, I hope you cooked it up in a frying pan.....Neocon-6/7/2002
14447<i>But then everyone has one of those, right? </i> Oh, lots 'n E-6/7/2002
14446I think that anyone in their right mind (who paid the least bit of attention) reE-6/7/2002
14445I am SO impressed. [Delete rest of this post; it's fine, just needed jigglE-6/7/2002
14444<<It's good it wasn't a case of a black celebrity defendant, a whiIsh-6/7/2002
14443I was amazed to hear commentary that the case was considered "thin." HE-6/7/2002
14442Yes, she left me alone after that. Did I mention the 12 pound rainbow?Ish-6/7/2002
14441I'll bet it did!LOL!!!Neocon-6/7/2002
14440Shit, I thought I had a fishing story going. It shocked her when someone knew whIsh-6/7/2002
14439<i>I believe him.</i> Message 17574926 You can refuse to face the E-6/7/2002
14438Shaddup and listen to Mallard. jewishworldreview.com jewishworldreview.com seattLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
14437I know that no one in the media has found a record of this caveat to the voters,E-6/7/2002
14436That is a great story. People respond better if one makes an effort to communicaNeocon-6/7/2002
14435<<I took French for about 4 years in junior and senior high school, and a Ish-6/7/2002
14434<i> I do hate paperwork</i> Oh. Well I would NOT want to burden youLazarus_Long-6/7/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):