SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer
An SI Board Since May 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2121 25 0
Emcee:  davidk555 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
1596Kirk, Are there any financial shows that have more audiance than Brinker's Boca_PETE10/14/2007
1595Kirk, Are there any financial shows that have more audience than Brinker's Boca_PETE10/14/2007
1594Kirk said <i>Why are you accusing David of a crime?</i> I believe mqueenleah10/14/2007
1593Kirk said <i>I don't understand this talk of a "stop loss" aqueenleah10/14/2007
1592Ding, ding, ding! I notice that both Kirk and David give Brinker a mulligan on Honey_Bee10/14/2007
1591You charged Mr Korn: <I>my comment that "... re-selling Brinker'Kirk ©10/14/2007
1590David, I find it odd also that you and everyone who wants to may say whatever thqueenleah10/14/2007
1589<I>queenleah >>Following and summarizing and analyzing and re-sellinKirk ©10/14/2007
1588I find that most everyone I know personally takes the responsibility for followidavidk55510/14/2007
1587<i>I think Bob could have said that if the trade [QQQ] did not work out, squeenleah10/14/2007
1586Avoiding the character issue of Bob Brinker, and then resorting to making some kdavidk55510/14/2007
1585I think it goes without saying that all recommendations to Marketimer subscriberdavidk55510/14/2007
1584..."If you have ever seen the bulletin, there were two glaring things wrongdick_from_chgoo10/14/2007
1583<i>Following and summarizing and analyzing and re-selling Brinker's woalleeox10/14/2007
1582<i>Of course, the lack of any stop loss also showed a bit of amateurness tqueenleah10/14/2007
1581<i>Of course, the lack of any stop loss also showed a bit of amateurness talleeox10/14/2007
1580I would agree that the QQQQ recommendation made first in October 2000, repeated davidk55510/14/2007
1579<I><<Not to forget, the real issue is properly accounting for QQQQ iKirk ©10/13/2007
1578kirk said: <<I never said it was catastrophic unless you lost confidence octavian10/13/2007
1577I never said it was catastrophic unless you lost confidence in Brinker as an <Kirk ©10/13/2007
1576queen said: <<But if I recall, dija/octavian has frequently stated that toctavian10/13/2007
1575kirk said: <<May I suggest you add to your list the FACT that Math Junkieoctavian10/13/2007
1574Kirk said to queen: <i>PMFJI again, but I think YOU are the one who wants queenleah10/13/2007
1573"But we were still talking about the whole James/Brinker matter, at least tKirk ©10/13/2007
1572<i>Wrong Ms Queen!! You most certainly would be invited.</i> Oh gooqueenleah10/13/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News