SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
An SI Board Since February 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
20039 79 0
Emcee:  Don Earl Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
15970Frankly, the people you think you're protecting would have let YOU go back iDoug R-9/19/2006
15969you again.......Frankly, it is insulting that you minimize the lives of those whHH-9/19/2006
15968Hands clearly decelerate on impact: youtube.com The physics of one object strikDoug R-9/19/2006
15967you and your opinion are too insignificant to care about whether you grasp HH-9/19/2006
15966<i> I would just love to see anyone replicate even a model experiment to sTigerPaw-9/19/2006
15965<i>the top 10 floors of #1 was heavy enough to drive the bottom 100 floorsTigerPaw-9/19/2006
15964<i>Perhaps they were trying to mask the first explosion with impact of theTigerPaw-9/19/2006
15963<i>to help accelerate them into the ground. </i> The first thing thTigerPaw-9/19/2006
15962<i>First, huge charges were set off in the basement to cut out a big chunkTigerPaw-9/19/2006
15961My argument currently swings on the fact that the building collapsed in under 20maceng2-9/19/2006
15960I'll be out for a few days. Here is some prior discussions on the matter of maceng2-9/19/2006
15959No, currently the physics says there must of been explosives on every floor. Unmaceng2-9/19/2006
15958<i>collapse of this nature.</i> There is a <u>prior history&lmaceng2-9/19/2006
15957<i>At least then you could do a half decent job of arguing.</i> I amaceng2-9/19/2006
15956Lieutenant-Colonel (ret.) Nigel Wylde, a former senior British Army IntelligenceDoug R-9/19/2006
15955Trailer for movie about FBI whistle blower Sibel Edmonds and gov't efforts tMighty_Mezz-9/19/2006
15954From that post I can tell you've never been to the pentagon. You don't klongnshort-9/19/2006
15953A likely explanation for taking out the core columns' support at bedrock levDoug R-9/18/2006
15952It's a fact that they recorded pre-impact tremors. ldeo.columbia.edu mgs.mDoug R-9/18/2006
15951Maybe they crashed the planes right where they planted the explosives? and no onOrcastraiter-9/18/2006
15950You want me to believe that the top 10 floors of #1 was heavy enough to drive thOrcastraiter-9/18/2006
15949<<< On #1 there were a series of puffs all coming from the middle facesDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15948<<< Most of the steel was a room temperature though. About 70 floors. TDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15947<<< as far as science can determine facts, the time taken for the buildDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15946Go to google or youtube and look for a short excerpt from the 60 minute eyewitneOrcastraiter-9/18/2006
15945"Those floors should have delayed the chain reaction collapse a bit." longnshort-9/18/2006
15944so they planted the explosives right where the planes hit?? and no one saw them longnshort-9/18/2006
15943Most of the steel was a room temperature though. About 70 floors. Those floors smaceng2-9/18/2006
15942the steel sagged, that was enough to start the chain reactionlongnshort-9/18/2006
15941<i>popular mechanics</i> Thanks. They may have done a good job chalmaceng2-9/18/2006
15940<i>LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL!</i> steady on, or you might maceng2-9/18/2006
15939<<< The air that is being squeezed out of pancaking floors had to go soDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15938<<< The only people who would have noticed the difference would have beDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15937<<< It's not a theory. It's a fact. >>> LOL! LOL! LOLDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15936<<< Well if my whole post is wrong...where would I begin? You'll haDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15935<<< For the compressed air theory, the first thing you'd have to exDavid Howe-9/18/2006
15934RE: "What I would like to see is someone with a good scientific background Don Earl-9/18/2006
15933Perhaps they were trying to mask the first explosion with impact of the planes. Orcastraiter-9/18/2006
15932Read the Popular Mechanics explainationlongnshort-9/18/2006
15931<i>But if you harbor no personal guilt for the "holocaust" but uCyprian-9/18/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):