SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SMSC Standard Microsystems
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
335 9 0 SMSC
Emcee:  Keith Fauci Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
160 OK, Thom, I admit that I am something of a novice, but what do you mean by &quoJohn Prugh-6/7/1997
159 Thom, At 2/3 of book value I find it hard to agree that selling the stock is adwight vickers-6/4/1997
158 Well... it's a little late, but,... uh, huh?...SMSC is a good company and athom-6/4/1997
157 To: Jim Goodman (PSYCHLE sm) Welcome! If you can elaborate on your system witdwight vickers-5/28/1997
156 There is some logic to what you say. I think that what made the company fly indwight vickers-5/28/1997
155 Thom, It doesn't take much running downhill to make SMSC profitable. I bodwight vickers-5/27/1997
154 How about a comment I heard either on CNBC (or PBS NBR) stating that 3Com was nRobert Salasidis-5/27/1997
153 Dwight, I cut losses and bailed awhile back. Wanted some positive news/momentumthom-5/27/1997
152 Jim, Couldn't find your new thread using full name or SMSC search. That hdwight vickers-5/24/1997
151 TO ALL: I accidently started another thread, Buying SMSC @ 8 7/8, last week, ifJim Goodman-5/23/1997
150 Phil, The P/E is screwed up because they sold a division last year and recordedwight vickers-4/27/1997
149 Whats the deal with SMSC's P/E ? I keep seeing a number about 5, but in somPhil Carinhas-4/26/1997
148 jelrod3, Don't know. I logged onto SI, and yours was the ONLY letter (iJohn Prugh-4/26/1997
147 TO ALL: Is there any way for the followers of this thread to get whoever contjelrod3-4/24/1997
146 Hi Judy, Sorry, I am a little late in replying. SMC thread is so quiet. WelJohn Prugh-4/8/1997
145 To all, Below is the link to a message on the UTEK thread that I thought was iDonald Isenhower-4/8/1997
144 I sold all for $101/8 at 18% proft for 3mo. It should go back to $9-10. I woulanatoly goldin-3/23/1997
143 Judy, Not looking to buy here. I will be picking a spot to sell calls againsdwight vickers-3/22/1997
142 Hi Dwight, If are buying, I'd like to hear about it. Thanks. JudyJudy Cohen-3/21/1997
141 Well someone is buying the heck out of it today . I don't know this stock TradeOfTheDay-3/21/1997
140 Judy, I will be watching the filings for the next six or eight weeks. If thesdwight vickers-3/21/1997
139 Hi John, On Jan 23, you said "I, too, wonder how a company with such a reJudy Cohen-3/21/1997
138 Dwight & All, See article today's Investor's Busines Daily titled John Duckett-3/20/1997
137 My guess is that Intel requires a close partnership with someone to supply mothRobert Salasidis-3/20/1997
136 I agree it's good news. But we have to keep in mind the 20% dilution, at adwight vickers-3/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):