SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19080 389 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17055I do agree with Jake that a can of worms has been opened with respect to ORCLMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17054I agree, but you also have to view context. I worked for a company (which I wMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17053>>You have attempted to make this an ORCL only issue. I'm just pointiJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17052You have attempted to make this an ORCL only issue. This is an issue with anyonJSwanson-5/31/2002
17051I just think it may have opened up a can of worms...that's all. Hey, agressiJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17050You did notice that all the complainants were gov't related, didn't you?MeDroogies-5/31/2002
17049May I suggest you read this - news.com.comJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17048<i>You defense of Oracle is almost laughable</i> Your attempts to mJSwanson-5/31/2002
17047Michael, you have come to the same conclusion as me, but from a different angle.MeDroogies-5/31/2002
17046Actually, a reply is necessary. My investment in ORCL is minor now, and has beeMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17045>>Claiming that Oracle "overcharges" anyone is a reach. Then hoJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17044Claiming that Oracle "overcharges" <I>anyone</I> is a reacMichael Olin-5/31/2002
17043You defense of Oracle is almost laughable, but I guess you're very emotionalJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17042I didn't flippantly toss it off. I stated the facts. ORCL did the right thMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17041Again, if I was a potential customer why shouldn't it be in the back of my mJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17040What we are taught, and how businesses (and government) act, are rarely the sameMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17039>>It isn't ORCL specific. No, Oracle is not alone. But hey, werenJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17038As is all the ORCL stuff. It just happens to involve ORCL... I posted my artMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17037MeDroogies, That's old news about gov't waste and mismanagement.JakeStraw-5/31/2002
17036More on how well the government does its purchasing oversight: nandotimes.comMeDroogies-5/31/2002
17035DB, I don't know. I can guess though that maybe some potential customers migJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17034I find it hard to believe anyone gives a rats ass about it. DBDBrian-5/31/2002
17033Economy on the mend > link > Link: cbs.marketwatch.comQualified Opinion-5/31/2002
17032Oracle plagued by California controversy: CNET (ORCL) : CNET reports this morninJakeStraw-5/31/2002
17031"When the companies do begin to spend, their top priority is installing entKevin Yang-5/31/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News