SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACTM $100 Million Cable Modem Contract with MOT
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1250 7 0 ACTM
Emcee:  Steve Marsel Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
175 Should we buy at this price? It looks awfully low now compared with @47 few daSonny Blue-9/10/1997
174 A popular figure of merit for PE's now is correlated to the annual growth iGordon Quickstad-9/8/1997
173 I think Wall Street analysts do sometimes have superior information or at leastjeffbas-9/8/1997
172 >> I think it's more like $39-43 based on 30x earnings.<< AccorJack Be Quick-9/7/1997
171 On Motley Fool, you allude that perhaps some insiders or industry experts have Robert Bond-9/7/1997
170 It depends on your point of view. As of last week's close, of the 3 industjeffbas-9/6/1997
169 I don't think the recent price action is the result of MM pulling a fast onRobert Bond-9/6/1997
168 Looks like the Market Muggers lured me into their trap. Bid is back up. Isn&#DD™-9/5/1997
167 In at @40, stopped out this morning @$36 1/2. And more gray hairs to show for DD™-9/5/1997
166 I'd also hazard a guess that the earnings warning by JPMX may also have hadRobert Bond-9/4/1997
165 <i>"I will sell my shares I bought at 38 3/4 around 48 whenever thatDD™-9/3/1997
164 I don't think analysts upgrade or downgrade stocks strictly on reality. In LzzrdKing-8/30/1997
163 ACTM seems to be holding its own quite well in the face of today's market dDD™-8/28/1997
162 See my post 158. I believe that the stock will be in a trading range like we hjeffbas-8/28/1997
161 ACTM may have been fairly priced at 48, but now that it is 38, does that mean iLzzrdKing-8/27/1997
160 To all: Does anyone see this thing going back to 48 again. I just checked theDD™-8/27/1997
159 I agree that this stock currently has limited upside potential. Though Jeff isRobert Bond-8/26/1997
158 I am certain that is the reason for the drop. But note that CEO Pino has statedjeffbas-8/26/1997
157 Down 4 5/8 (9.9%)........why, because one analyst started coverage with a hold?Steve-8/26/1997
156 Thanks for the info. That DOES look good. GordonGordon Quickstad-8/20/1997
155 Note that ACT roughly doubled the size of its relationship with BAY in the secojeffbas-8/20/1997
154 I believe that ACTM will do $2.50 in 1999 on $500 million sales and on 1 milliojeffbas-7/28/1997
153 Jeffrey,..I didn't know you were so attuned to the ECM segment.(There is a puborectalis-7/27/1997
152 I cannot answer your specific questions. Call Doug Greenlaw, CFO at the companjeffbas-7/27/1997
151 Jeffrey, I almost bought this baby but didn't want to concentrate all my asHiram Walker-7/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News