SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?
An SI Board Since July 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3029 28 0
Emcee:  sandintoes Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1779 Believing in strong border controls doesn't walk or quack like a racist. TTimF-6/22/2006
1778CYBERKEN is, as always, just exactly as incensed as the situation warrants. No mCYBERKEN-6/22/2006
1777<<it wouldn't be solid evidence that I was a racist or a populist.>CYBERKEN-6/22/2006
1776Whats the matter, you got something against the DEMOCRATIC process? haha. jdnJDN-6/21/2006
1775 Back on topic Hudson v. Michigan: volokh.com Rapanos v. United States and CaTimF-6/21/2006
1774<i> There's a difference between not wanting to pay for huge masses ofTimF-6/21/2006
1773<i> Hell, we dont need no war with Mexico </i> Yes we don't nTimF-6/21/2006
1772I think you're a bit more incensed than the situation calls for, Cyber. In Jim S-6/21/2006
1771Hell, we dont need no war with Mexico, all we need to do is round up all the illJDN-6/21/2006
1770 I'm neither racist nor populist. Even if I actually had views like "TimF-6/21/2006
1769<<No one is talking about starting a war with Mexico.>> You and theCYBERKEN-6/21/2006
1768<i> Starting a war against Mexico </i> That comment certainly camTimF-6/19/2006
1767Starting a war against Mexico is nothing new, but it won't play today. The cCYBERKEN-6/17/2006
1766 Since we aren't conquering and annexing countries, setting up concentratioTimF-6/16/2006
1765<I> You really are missing the whole point: "Troops on the border&quTimF-6/16/2006
1764Nothing overblown about the Hitler and Stalin references at all. The propagandisCYBERKEN-6/16/2006
1763You really are missing the whole point: "Troops on the border" is the CYBERKEN-6/16/2006
1762SCOTUS has ruled that cops don't need to knock on a knock warrant. news.yahoJim S-6/15/2006
1761 No it doesn't sound familiar. Troops on the border is not uncommon, any nTimF-6/15/2006
1760Troops on the border and racism. It sure SOUNDS familiar. If course. "It cCYBERKEN-6/15/2006
1759And "troops on the border" has little relevance to what made them stanTimF-6/12/2006
1758The "gentlemen" you mention all had "troops on the border", CYBERKEN-6/12/2006
1757 Ok you lay out the connection. What is it. "Troops on the border" TimF-6/12/2006
1756If you can't see the connection, we may continue toward a totalitarian stateCYBERKEN-6/12/2006
1755<i> The entire Stalin Terror, with it's mountain of bodies, was based TimF-6/12/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):