SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19079 388 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18004This war looks like the definition of whiplash. It appears to be more bottomingrobert b furman-3/25/2003
18003I wouldn't bet the farm if ORCL hits 10.50, after today, it could drop even ehasfjord-3/25/2003
18002Thank You Very Much, and best wishes!ehasfjord-3/24/2003
18001Hi Ehas, yup,I'm salivating at 10.ish too. Think I'll buy some stock arobert b furman-3/23/2003
18000Hi Ehas, Just returned from meeting in San Antonio,sorry for the delay. I see robert b furman-3/23/2003
17999Hi M, Even if this is a great bottom being confirmed by a higher low in the majrobert b furman-3/23/2003
17998Click on a person's name, it takes you to the profile. In the upper right hMeDroogies-3/23/2003
17997OT How do you send a "private" message? TIAehasfjord-3/23/2003
17996Still waiting for ORCL to drop some more (which it shows signs of doing). Itehasfjord-3/22/2003
17995LOL..I'm not really heavily into ORCL now. I've been in and out, but hoMeDroogies-3/21/2003
17994Back up the truck?? My tires are about to pop and the frame is resting on the hrobert b furman-3/21/2003
17993I agree about the large position amongst management. The downside to greed, howMeDroogies-3/21/2003
17992Hi Ehas, Actually I like a company that has management that has a huge positionrobert b furman-3/21/2003
17991Thanks for the post! I must have overlooked it. I still have some reservations ehasfjord-3/20/2003
17990While I agree in principle, how does this handle large owners of the company (suehasfjord-3/20/2003
17989I planned on buying at 11.70, but it was looking so weak, I held off. Will waMeDroogies-3/19/2003
17988<i>I was pleasantly surprised by the orcl numbers. I'm not sure about brushwud-3/18/2003
17987well, I'm feeling better about things fundamentally lately. I think we grinLizzie Tudor-3/18/2003
17986I agree about AH. Thing is, they haven't been a barometer IF the move was sMeDroogies-3/18/2003
17985I was pleasantly surprised by the orcl numbers. I'm not sure about the stocLizzie Tudor-3/18/2003
17984That's nothing. My sister works for Verizon. They have a rule that every yMeDroogies-3/18/2003
17983Oracle better watch it, seriously. <I>Sun hit with discrimination suit ILizzie Tudor-3/18/2003
17982What's the word? Doesn't ORCL report today?MeDroogies-3/18/2003
17981Hi Ehas, I'm no expert ,but I think it is more a ground swell that must comrobert b furman-3/18/2003
17980Here is the actual, recent FASB announcement regarding the expensing stock optiohueyone-3/18/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News