SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18333Anything made with smoked ham hocks, the world's most instant headache triggE-7/28/2002
18332NAS Panel: Only Safe Intake of Trans Fat is Zero CSPI Says Report Makes Case FoE-7/28/2002
18331Maybe the surreal colorized version....<g>Tom Clarke-7/28/2002
18330You're talking about Tucson, I'm talking about Lincoln County, New MexicTom Clarke-7/28/2002
18329I had the same reaction. That it was an awareness-campaign sort of thing. And I&E-7/28/2002
18328Wise choice. ;-)Poet-7/28/2002
18327<i>Hey! A quarter cup of lard ain't bad for 48 ounces of beans...<gLane3-7/28/2002
18326Try cooking it like this, Karen. Hey! A quarter cup of lard ain't bad for Solon-7/28/2002
18325Look on the bright side: for the rest of their lives the boys will have a ready-Dayuhan-7/27/2002
18324The TP syndrome is alive and well at NOW. You could almost call it the NOW syndDayuhan-7/27/2002
18323I think you missed the point. There was a sentence in there that you didn'tDayuhan-7/27/2002
18322All nine miners are alive.E-7/27/2002
18321You have a writing gift, do you also weave a story telling saga as well as you sandintoes-7/27/2002
18320Dear Mr. Long..Mr. Short said to tell you that you cannot control liberals. He sandintoes-7/27/2002
18319<I>OK. I've never HEARD of Popeye's? He's a sailor with a spinLane3-7/27/2002
18318<i>Oh, really? Have you tried? </i> OK. I've never HEARD of PopLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18317<i>He's called people 'losers', told them they've ruined hLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18316Deleted.Lazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18315hmmm...How'd that happen?one_less-7/27/2002
18314I'm impressed that you found that. I looked again today at their PDF table Lane3-7/27/2002
18313You've got to watch it, Laz. Three judges in the recording industry: Paula Poet-7/27/2002
18312Does this confirm that I'm the dumb one on this thread? Well, all right. Lazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18311<i>Now Laz knows what I do for fun.</i> Laz considers that Newton MiLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18310About that Clinton bubble: Message 17763063 Do you get it now?Lazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18309Popeye's is only in the South, I think. They serve reeeeeally greasy fried Poet-7/27/2002
18308<i>Or the fat content of the McDonald's grilled chicken flatbread, whiWin Smith-7/27/2002
18307LOL. I think that's interesting that you and Erma share a birthday. ConsidePoet-7/27/2002
18306Big mouth! Now we won't be able to claim that the SEC exonerated us...Lane3-7/27/2002
18305<b>Top minds of SI admit to being American Idol groupies!!!</b>Rambi-7/27/2002
18304I have seen some adults at parties trying to maintain gravity, haven't you? Rambi-7/27/2002
18303I was surprised he wasn't honest with Christina either. I mean, he's obvPoet-7/27/2002
18302TRUE CONFESSIONS! I actually cancelled a dinner date because I refused to miss ARambi-7/27/2002
18301Oh man, now I'm going to admit publicly that I watch "American Idol&quoPoet-7/27/2002
18300<i>How much do you want to bet that "in good physical health" isLane3-7/27/2002
18299<i>Aw, come on, Karen, "nutritional information", my &&&Lane3-7/27/2002
18298Welcome Doug. And good point.Lazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18297Welcome, san-din-to-es. Good to see you. We persecuted conservatives need youLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18296Speaking of Clinton, Monica, BJs, etc., just where was NOW, the woman's watcLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18295<i>Whether we like it or not, and whether it's justifiable or not, forLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18294How much do you want to bet that "in good physical health" is code forPoet-7/27/2002
18293Did he say he would donate the profits to charity? Why did the words "legLazarus_Long-7/27/2002
18292Something else from the believe-it-or-not department... ABC Seeks Unattractive Lane3-7/27/2002
18291For the benefit of those who think I'm utterly biased against Bush, just wanLane3-7/27/2002
18290<i>Still, stupidity of epic proportions....</i> I saw the attorney Lane3-7/27/2002
18289I suppose it was only a matter of time. Still, stupidity of epic proportions...Dayuhan-7/27/2002
18288I've no doubt that Clinton would have taken that route if the specific naturDayuhan-7/27/2002
18287Most excellent, yes. I hope Steven responds to it. There was quite a differencLazarus_Long-7/26/2002
18286<i>staying away from trading................. With all the volatility thiLazarus_Long-7/26/2002
18285Maybe of interest to sinusitis sufferers. A couple of years old, but I'd nevE-7/26/2002
18284Wonderful! Very Irma Bombeck...I had to save it! Reminds me of the time a littsandintoes-7/26/2002
18283I win again.one_less-7/26/2002
18282I love that article. It's been quiet here the past few days.Poet-7/26/2002
18281Yes! We've kicked the habit! I also have to admit that I had twinges this Poet-7/26/2002
18280REMAINING U.S. CEOs MAKE A BREAK FOR IT Band of Roving Chief Executives SpotteLane3-7/26/2002
18279Hi Po, I've been trying to lead a normal life-- staying away from trading. YRambi-7/26/2002
18278Hi Rambi, I loved reading that piece on Passive Recipient Defense. I'd beePoet-7/26/2002
18277You're welcome.Lane3-7/26/2002
18276That piece brought a smile to my face. :-) Thanks.Bill-7/26/2002
18275<i>In fairness, I suspect that this transition has as much to do with learLazarus_Long-7/26/2002
18274No-Respect Politics By Charles Krauthammer Friday, July 26, 2002; Page A33 ToLane3-7/26/2002
18273<I><< I remember a Nigerian friend's comment: "...in my couBill-7/26/2002
18272<i>In most countries it wouldn't have raised more than a snicker. I reDOUG H-7/26/2002
18271Not yet. But neither is he... geocities.comBill-7/26/2002
18270Are you wearing one yet? bushwares.comLane3-7/26/2002
18269<i> In a decade it will be a footnote.</i> The Clinton Presidency wjlallen-7/26/2002
18268<i>Probably created a few awkward parent-child moments, but hardly a natioRambi-7/26/2002
18267<I><< Can't you see the similarity between "we did it all bBill-7/26/2002
18266<i>Like I said, a low level operation.</i> Can't you see the siDayuhan-7/26/2002
18265Actually it's already in perspective, outside of a few lost corners on InterDayuhan-7/26/2002
18264<i>And that is the differecne between you and I</i> Sorry, which ofDayuhan-7/26/2002
18263Excuses and alibis and "putting into perspective" are what the left isBill-7/26/2002
18262<i>Clinton taught 4th graders what a blow job was.</i> It could be Dayuhan-7/26/2002
18261Like I said, a low level operation. They thought they were doing the right thingBill-7/26/2002
18260<i>It was akin to David Watkins using the WH helicopter to transport him aDayuhan-7/26/2002
18259That's true.....jlallen-7/26/2002
18258North was not a high level employee. He should have done some time. But it'Bill-7/26/2002
18257<I><< It doesn't look any farther down to me than it did a decadBill-7/26/2002
18256I think North and Poindexter went way beyond that and they deserved to do some tjlallen-7/26/2002
18255And that is the differecne between you and I and between demolibs and conservatijlallen-7/26/2002
18254<i>I find Bush an immeasureable improvement over Clinton as a man and as aDayuhan-7/26/2002
18253It was a low level operation which impacted no one. A couple guys should have doBill-7/26/2002
18252A I recall, Poindexter and North were convicted and basically had their lives anjlallen-7/26/2002
18251<i>Generally, I don't think too many SI'ers have trouble figuring Lane3-7/26/2002
18250<i>Thank you. That's what I've been saying. </i> We all do jlallen-7/26/2002
18249Thanks. I noticed he didn't respond....jlallen-7/26/2002
18248Good post jlaBill Grant-7/26/2002
18247<i>Guess that depends on how you determine weaker and poorer....</i>Dayuhan-7/26/2002
18246<i>If you can find examples of where I've canonized Bush, feel free toDayuhan-7/26/2002
18245me too.jlallen-7/26/2002
18244I hardly think the word "inscrutable" applies to me. Generally, I donjlallen-7/26/2002
18243Guess that depends on how you determine weaker and poorer.... In many ways the jlallen-7/26/2002
18242<i>LOL. Really.</i> Yes really. For example, I think the steel tajlallen-7/26/2002
18241<i>And that is every bit as dangerous as anything Nixon ever did......... Dayuhan-7/26/2002
18240That post really makes me wonder about the future of this country....I suspect yjlallen-7/26/2002
18239<i>The rationalist in me says that the attitudes that make you Republican Dayuhan-7/26/2002
18238<i>When one of the pinheads admits that the Clinton Affair was about more Dayuhan-7/26/2002
18237<i>I consider Iran/Contra a non-event. </i> Of course. Lying and bDayuhan-7/26/2002
18236<i>These ultra-partisans fail to appreciate just how morally bankrupt ClinDayuhan-7/26/2002
18235<i>I never made Bush out to be a saint. I disagree with his policy frequenDayuhan-7/26/2002
18234<i>then he couldn't keep his pants zipped though at least he didn'Dayuhan-7/26/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News