SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SMSC Standard Microsystems
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
335 9 0 SMSC
Emcee:  Keith Fauci Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
185 Looks like we're breaking out on big volume today. Let's wait and see dwight vickers-7/16/1997
184 Seems like they're trying to convince us we're going to fail in resistadwight vickers-7/16/1997
183 no guarantees, but MSFT @ 132, with close stop above, is on my pot. "PSYCLJim Goodman-7/10/1997
182 I use puts but I've been trying to pick tops lately, to get the big hit, indwight vickers-7/9/1997
181 appreciate your comment....hey, if it was that easy.... seriously, I try to dJim Goodman-7/9/1997
180 Jim, I've been looking at charts for over 25 years so I have a passable kndwight vickers-7/7/1997
179 excellent, dwight....but, I just hardly ever write covered calls....I pretty muJim Goodman-7/7/1997
178 The best way to play SMSC over the last three years has been to be a seller of dwight vickers-7/3/1997
177 good comments....I usually try not to prejudge any move, so I do also await higJim Goodman-7/3/1997
176 Jim, I've been charting stocks for over 25 years, myself. But it never hudwight vickers-7/3/1997
175 what "caused" the recent pop in SMSC, was good old "technical&quJim Goodman-7/2/1997
174 Anyone hear what caused yesterday's jump? Dwightdwight vickers-7/2/1997
173 A poster on the Motley Fool board says that he picked up on a local NY station dwight vickers-6/27/1997
172 The news is out. Business Wire. As pre-announced, it's better than last qJudy Cohen-6/25/1997
171 Peter, I'm in total agreement. The problem for small individual shareholddwight vickers-6/23/1997
170 Hi Dwight, Look at my response to John. We need to stand up and vote against tpeter lo-6/23/1997
169 Hi John and all share holders I have received the proxy also. I voted for the rpeter lo-6/23/1997
168 John, As if directors don't get paid too much, already. I agree about thedwight vickers-6/23/1997
167 Everybody, I just got my annual report re SMSC (this is probably old news). John Prugh-6/21/1997
166 To all, the stock looks just break out 50 day moving average. In technically, peter lo-6/12/1997
165 Peter, A small company like SMSC vs. Intel is a tough battle, as you say. I&#dwight vickers-6/10/1997
164 Do you know what is the reason the Intel invest in SMSC? Because Intel infringpeter lo-6/10/1997
163 Hard to argue with that. Hopefully it will lead to business that gets SMSC movdwight vickers-6/10/1997
162 Yes, shitty management. The current management should be kicked out from the cpeter lo-6/9/1997
161 John, Good products and technology, and solid financially. But shitty managemdwight vickers-6/9/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):