SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1865Cacaito, <<Miljenko, infantile you keep asking for leak from FDA, again mMiljenko Zuanic-1/22/2002
1864Very objective article. I will add: <<If we put together all that has bMiljenko Zuanic-1/22/2002
1863Irwin, if Erbitux works fine, but BMY will not look for paying more, they will gCacaito-1/22/2002
1862Miljenko, infantile you keep asking for leak from FDA, again most probably leak Cacaito-1/22/2002
1861Here is a link to a newsletter article that some might find interesting: prohosThe Dodgy Ticker-1/22/2002
1860Cacaito, It seems to me that you have some of the facts right. I reach a diffeIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-1/22/2002
1859First I wrote long respond to previous post, but decided for short one. To tiredMiljenko Zuanic-1/22/2002
1858Why, cause the FDA did not inform the public on time? cause The Cancer Letter diCacaito-1/22/2002
1857Yes, price should drop to 1 penny per share. So, you should make few bucks. NotMiljenko Zuanic-1/22/2002
1856Valuation scenario, a darker one is needed: 1. The contents of the RTF are alreCacaito-1/22/2002
1855Valuation - scenario: 1. If the contents of the RTF printed by the Cancer Letter613-1/21/2002
1854No.keokalani'nui-1/21/2002
1853Looking for answers... Placed on the 'Biotech Valuation' thread yesterdscott_jiminez-1/21/2002
1852ImClone's Woes Cast a Broader Biotech Shadow [NYT Article] Message 16938770sim1-1/21/2002
1851Yes, call option purchasers are eligible, because calls are considered securitiechalu2-1/20/2002
1850Cacaito, You've made it clear to me, many thanks for your response. Best rThe Dodgy Ticker-1/20/2002
1849C255 (Erbitux) "Fast Track" status is determined by the need of patienCacaito-1/20/2002
1848Does saying this for the first time, in an S.E.C. filing, signify anything, or iaknahow-1/20/2002
1847For anyone who knows the answer: Something that I don't understand about C2The Dodgy Ticker-1/20/2002
1846Do people bought call options also eligible for the lawsuits or just common stocTI2, TechInvestorToo-1/20/2002
1845i have been reading about the Waksal brothers and it is very eye-popping.These gLTK007-1/20/2002
1844IMCLONE is the ENRON of BiotechsLabrador-1/20/2002
1843Hi Sea Otter- Remenber me? Very interesting whats going. I'm think of gettiJF2155-1/19/2002
1842As a lawyer representing shareholders in this mess (don't hit me!), this is chalu2-1/19/2002
1841Copy of my post on the valuation thread: Barron's has a copy of the RTF letIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-1/19/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News