SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
gem-x's incredibly accurate Elliott Wave forecasts.
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2290 72 0
Emcee:  gem-x Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1890You appear to be using SiliconInvestor as a free advertising page for your pay pj g cordes-3/15/2002
1889gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: March 13..Wave 4 or Wave 2 Today started nasDEM-3/13/2002
1888gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: March 12 02, A top or more pop? Previous dayDEM-3/12/2002
1887gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast for March 11, 02. More dramatic move ahead?? DEM-3/10/2002
1886gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: March 08, 02..Dramatic move ahead? GreenspaDEM-3/8/2002
1885that's assuming that any amount of money would keep him alive.EepOpp-3/8/2002
1884gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: March 07, 02...Wave 5 or Wave B Today came iDEM-3/7/2002
1883Hi Dem, Wave 4 ends at 1841. We noe on Wave 5 - To 1942-45???? Naz about to grobert b furman-3/6/2002
1882Hi Dem, Meant to say NAZ peak at 1886. Looks like a nice positive divergence irobert b furman-3/5/2002
1881Hi DEM, Looks like we're hanging in ther at the NAZ after peaking at 1881isrobert b furman-3/5/2002
1880gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: March 5, 02. Heavy volume breakout, for possiDEM-3/5/2002
1879Gem-x asked me to post this message: "Just post something in the context oMoominoid-3/2/2002
1878So an accurate E-Wave forecaster can not tolerate opposing viewpoints (from othensumir81-3/1/2002
1877Why was I banned DEM, O SE MI gem-x assistant? I only took issue with the authnsumir81-3/1/2002
1876Fwd: gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: Mar 01, 02 Pretty sloppy day...it was pDEM-3/1/2002
1875Fwd: gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: Feb 28, 02 The type of wave I was expecDEM-3/1/2002
1874gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: Feb 27 02 (I don't know what happened, DEM-3/1/2002
1873gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: Feb 26, 02 Ok, the NASDAQ now has a completeDEM-3/1/2002
1872gem-x just released all the banned bears from his board These names have been rDEM-3/1/2002
1871Interesting that we would pay 5 million to solve the Perl case but not a penny tiowamann, Spam Queen-2/27/2002
1870Hi David, I'll see if I can't churn up an exhaustion gap up in the mornrobert b furman-2/25/2002
1869It's just that the e-wave pattern since mid-day Wednesday has been very confMoominoid-2/25/2002
1868gem-x's Elliott Wave Forecast: Feb 25, 02 On Friday, the NASDAQ dropped doDEM-2/25/2002
1867Hi David, Oh I don't know - it looks to me like +Di just crossed over -DI robert b furman-2/25/2002
1866Uncharacteristically bearish charts from me: cres.anu.edu.au cres.anu.edu.au HMoominoid-2/25/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):