SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The Judiciary
An SI Board Since April 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
817 12 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
192In the slightly longer run, whichever party gets in front of THIS will be in theCYBERKEN-3/28/2006
191OT: Even a one term Senator gets a princely retirement income for life funded enPeter Dierks-3/24/2006
190Makes the Mad Cow and his "gang of 14" look pretty stupid, doesn'tCYBERKEN-3/24/2006
189According to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee's website, as of March 17, Peter Dierks-3/24/2006
188Peter, I just don't like the idea of treating prison inmates like first clashaqihana-2/21/2006
187Switzerland used to offer their inmates bread and water. There were additional aPeter Dierks-2/21/2006
186Peter, OK, there is a difference between frivolous, and vexations, but they are haqihana-2/21/2006
185That is a frivolous law suit. Frivolous is much different than vexatious. EnoughPeter Dierks-2/20/2006
184Peter, I understand now, and there are far too many law suits like that these dahaqihana-2/18/2006
183Here is a link to a definition of Vexatious litigant suit: lectlaw.comPeter Dierks-2/18/2006
182Peter, Had never heard that phrase, but it sounds like something dishonest lawyehaqihana-2/18/2006
181Are you familiar with the term Vexatious Litigant? Those to whom it applies canPeter Dierks-2/17/2006
180Peter, Yeah, but maybe the new lawyers would have got the lesson by what happenehaqihana-2/17/2006
179If there was no such thing as law, man would invent it. It would be futile to kPeter Dierks-2/16/2006
178Peter, They're lawyers. What did you expect? Shakespeare was right!haqihana-2/16/2006
177Affirmative Blackmail The ABA orders law schools to practice racial preference-Peter Dierks-2/16/2006
176A smear continues Although Senate Democrats were unable to lay a glove on JPeter Dierks-2/14/2006
175The Roberts-Alito Court Thank you, Ted Kennedy and Ralph Neas. Thursday, JanuPeter Dierks-1/26/2006
174The Battle of Princeton Borking has lost its bite. BY DANIEL HENNINGER FridaPeter Dierks-1/13/2006
173 Alito's opponents seem to want to paint the CAP as being something like a TimF-1/12/2006
172Supreme Court: Battlefield justice Samuel Alito's abortion views have drawnPeter Dierks-1/12/2006
171Senate Civility Why Mrs. Alito left the room. Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:0Peter Dierks-1/12/2006
170Doing It Right The editorial Sen. Kennedy wants Judge Alito to read. WednesdaPeter Dierks-1/11/2006
169Congress can't usurp the president's power to spy on America's enemiPeter Dierks-12/28/2005
168There is no question that the Congress was required to investigate Impeachment iPeter Dierks-12/27/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News