Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

An SI Board Since June 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
198267	1051	8	QCOM

Emcee: Silcon Observer	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
195836	Here come the articles pumping Arm now: Exclusive: Qualcomm shifts chips to new	QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	13	10/1/2025
195835	AI Is Going to Wrap Itself Around You, From Your Glasses to Your Car In an excl	Bill Wolf	-	10/1/2025
195834	Qualcomm Says US Court Rejects Arm’s Final Claim in Lawsuit By Peter Blumberg Se	Bill Wolf	3	10/1/2025
195833	<i> Dismissal "with prejudice" means ...</i> I've	Elroy	1	10/1/2025
195832	Dismissal "with prejudice" means the issue cannot be revived, and it i	JeffreyHF	10	10/1/2025
195831	Reuters; Arm plans to appeal final ruling in Qualcomm dispute SAN FRANCISCO (Re	GR8FORM	3	10/1/2025
195830	QCOM press release: Qualcomm Achieves Complete Victory Over Arm in Litigation Ch	GR8FORM	5	9/30/2025
195829	Kind of like Lucy Koh. She got that smack down in the Federal Circuit Court of	freefromwires	1	9/30/2025
195828	arm-plans-appeal-final-ruling-qualcomm-dispute-2025-10-01/ reuters.com Release	waitwatchwander	5	9/30/2025
195827	The last paragraph says it all.	freefromwires	5	9/30/2025
195826	Qualcomm Achieves Complete Victory Over Arm in Litigation Challenging Licensing	ryhack	18	9/30/2025
195825	The CMS material would be covered by however Nuvia contracted for their ALA with	waitwatchwander	1	9/30/2025
195824	it would really depend on the economics of it. Will they be able to get a judgem	engineer	3	9/30/2025
195823	I thought it was without an opportunity to refile but I could be wrong. If they	waitwatchwander	2	9/30/2025
195822	I would not settle anything and would see the Qcom V Arm case through to its bit	freefromwires	5	9/30/2025
195821	with predjudice. which means they reserved to take it up later.	engineer	3	9/30/2025
195820	Qualcomm being the nice folks they are, dropped that counterclaim. :(	waitwatchwander	1	9/30/2025
195819	I believe the withholding done by Arm and covered by the Q vs Arm suit relates t	waitwatchwander	4	9/30/2025
195818	Ah I see. Qualcomm dropped that with prejudice earlier, I'll see if I can di	QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	2	9/30/2025
195817	that is not the question. I saw that result and understand it. What I am asking	engineer	3	9/30/2025
195816	Yes, the ruling entails that all of Qualcomm's chipsets are licensed under t	QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	6	9/30/2025
195815	now that this phase is settled, will they also get a ruling on the use of nuvia	engineer	1	9/30/2025
195814	On the great news that Nuvia & Q didn't violate the Nuvia ALA...and Q wa	ryhack	6	9/30/2025
195813	Hard to say, Arm did want the court to decide in this case so it could make deci	QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	7	9/30/2025
195812	Thanks QHT for sharing the good news. Is it now fair to assume that both compan	vkvraju5	2	9/30/2025

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):