SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
198197 1048 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
196912if the tax regs change the AMT for QCOM etal - specifically QCOM should recoup tOptntrdr1999-12/11/2025
196911LG Strengthens Automotive Electronics, Leads AI Vehicle Solutions in PartnershiJim Mullens412/11/2025
196910Trump Administration Plans to Boost Tax Break for Corporations Caitlin Reilly ThBill Wolf612/11/2025
196909It's also possible they get very favorable treatment as a founding investor,Wildbiftek612/11/2025
196908The reason Apple got an incredibly favorable ALA until 2040 is no doubt because QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN712/11/2025
196907No way they're going to get a pre-trial settlement. In the context of the QuQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN1112/11/2025
196906the big gorilla in the room is apple. when they start going heavy down the risc engineer512/11/2025
196905i just wonder how long before Mayosi Son realizes that they are seeing the end oengineer712/11/2025
196904O99 re: QCOM v ARM- Ventana / RISC-V- potential implications ................Jim Mullens212/11/2025
196903I ran similar questions through Gemini - got similar results - I did focus on thOptntrdr1999312/11/2025
196902Wild, re: Ventana Micro Systems ..............................................Jim Mullens512/11/2025
196901Ventana comes with a well rounded executive. riscvsummit2021.sched.com youtu.bwaitwatchwander112/10/2025
196900Yes, going the patent expiry route Apple would be stuck with basic 4G/LTE prior waitwatchwander412/10/2025
196899if they want to stay 17 years behind the state of the art, then they can play thengineer912/10/2025
196898yea antenna gate saved their butt.engineer412/10/2025
196897Elroy, I agree with you I like stocks which go up. Five years ago I invested iFrank Sully-12/10/2025
196896I should have been clearer - AAPL has a problem with its tolling at the App StorOptntrdr1999512/10/2025
196895Android 16 has a new "Artificial Intelligence" usage option under &quowaitwatchwander212/10/2025
196894if cost was a concern for analysts - it would have been an issue - instead theirOptntrdr1999212/10/2025
196893O1999, re: AAPL modems .......................................................Jim Mullens-12/10/2025
196892Yes, none have kept up with Qualcomm as to innovation but that wasn't my maiwaitwatchwander412/10/2025
196891you guys are all confirming my point....but your analysis forgets the required bOptntrdr1999212/10/2025
196890CA is sitting across from president trump right now along with Michael dell and GR8FORM1112/10/2025
196889There is a cost factor in the actions of Apple. When Apple's current contrawaitwatchwander412/10/2025
196888"i agree with you it is all about control," It's all about arrogamatherandlowell712/10/2025
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):