SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19801Prove that it isn't. Or maybe you think all those lower margins and losses fsylvester80-4/3/2002
19800sylvester, Prove that selling GSM euipment is "zero margin" business.Dave-4/3/2002
19799<b>Alcatel and Cisco gun for top spot </b> In a shift of market sharDavid Hansen-4/2/2002
19798Who cares. Now for something really important, how do you get those Spiderman faDavid Hansen-4/2/2002
19797Hey Sabre, They weren't my comments! As my post noted, they are _elmatador&#John Soileau-4/2/2002
19796Nobody. They are getting it at cost. GSM infrastructure sales are at zero marginsylvester80-4/2/2002
19795Who benefits from Cingular upgrade of West Coast network? Cingular Invests MillKenneth E. Phillipps-4/2/2002
19794Nice day for Lucent considering the rest of the markets are getting their heads sylvester80-4/2/2002
19793Looks like we are bucking the trends again today... Lot's of resistance at $David Hansen-4/2/2002
19792WSRN.com picks LUCENT company of the week. wsrn.comAnonymous-4/1/2002
19791Huh??? In VoIP has nothing unique that LU does not already have or want. Same fosylvester80-4/1/2002
19790Agreed. battleground?? Armageddon!! Ar·ma·ged·don: The scene ofelmatador-4/1/2002
19789Will certainly slow down a softswitch explosion, won't it? Early adopters haDavid Hansen-4/1/2002
19788"I think the RBOCs are more risk averse" Boy, you surely have a way wielmatador-4/1/2002
19787The network is shrinking. You can do more stuff with less variety of boxes. DIelmatador-4/1/2002
19786How? WHen Cisco's AVVID family is eating everyone's VoIP lunch... NT doeDavid Hansen-4/1/2002
19785John, I agree with you completely. I also think that we will only see recovery aDavid Hansen-4/1/2002
19784I think Sylvie was talking "Super Boxes" as in more capacity ala 40G, David Hansen-4/1/2002
19783Would LU benefit from NT's VoIP Succession Platform business with Sprint andKenneth E. Phillipps-4/1/2002
19782Whose going to believe that the bottom has been hit? No one in this industry hasDavid Hansen-4/1/2002
19781Very well said. A merger of LU and NT does not make any sense to me either. Nortsylvester80-4/1/2002
19780How does NT unlock any value in Lucent and vice versa? On the circuit switching David Hansen-4/1/2002
19779Ok... yes, I misunderstood. I do agree that decrease in capex spending by carriStock Farmer-3/31/2002
19778I disagree with what you wrote and I think you misinterpreted my <i>bang&lsylvester80-3/31/2002
19777<i>You'll be hearing the opposite when all of a sudden... bang!. I sayStock Farmer-3/31/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News