SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22682Do you people discuss Bob Brinker much on this message board?Jonathonrmks-7/28/2006
22681I agree everyone did it at one time or another on Yahoo and wasted far too much Kirk ©-7/28/2006
22680It's a question of degree. Yes, I joined you and others on Yahoo, in playingMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22679So how do you explain the disappearance of Butter at the same time as Queen? Yostockalot-7/28/2006
22678<B>Both here and on Yahoo, Stockalot has been accusing Queen for at least Kirk ©-7/28/2006
22677"<i>I've been friends with this poster for several years now, butMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22676Pig, I happen to think that people have a right to defend themselves and other pMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22675Two things you wrote that are bothering me, ms queen; Firstly, you are now clHoney_Bee-7/28/2006
22674"<i>I can see why SI didn't buy that one.</i>" Just mMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22673cheatstockalot said in his nonstop, off-topic attack on queen, misquoting again queenleah-7/28/2006
22672>>First of all, can you please explain what your post has to do with the tpigstuff-7/28/2006
22671"<i>Why was Queenbunchonumbers and Butter "Banished" at theMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22670"<i>Well Math, it looks like Queen was Butter and bit the dust here aMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22669I have to admit, your stories are entertaining. As for what they have to do witKirk ©-7/28/2006
22668 "another" person in "another department" joined about the sstockalot-7/28/2006
22667"<i>QueenOfMultipleIDs</i>" Kirk, I'm really surpriseMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22666Cheatstockalot, I thought you weren't supposed to spend all your time attackqueenleah-7/28/2006
22665First of all, can you please explain what your post has to do with the topic of Math Junkie-7/28/2006
22664Queen's words explaining the Banishment of Queen and Butter at the same timestockalot-7/28/2006
22663kirk said <i> I see, by clicking on your name, that you were banished for queenleah-7/28/2006
22662Despite the protestations from one of the serial harassers of Brinker's critshres-7/28/2006
22661Why was Queenbunchonumbers and Butter "Banished" at the same time thenstockalot-7/28/2006
22660No stockalot, queen was never butter and there's no ton of aliases. I only hqueenleah-7/28/2006
22659Well Math, it looks like Queen was Butter and bit the dust here at SI and a ton stockalot-7/28/2006
22658>><B>Honey wrote:</B> Are you saying that Brinker's integrKirk ©-7/28/2006
22657Dija trying to alibi for the STILL OPEN BUT now deeply hidden and not counted instockalot-7/28/2006
22656Despite the protestations from one of the <B>serial harassers of Brinker&#Kirk ©-7/28/2006
22655You made a very specific claim that was a lie. Your credibility is now zero witKirk ©-7/28/2006
22654Kirk, will you be writing a pay per hit article about this to include in the Bobshres-7/28/2006
22653<B>Core Inflation at 11 Year High</b> Chart of Inflation vs. EnergyKirk ©-7/28/2006
22652Ms. Tres, earlier this morning Kirk admitted that he was being paid for hits to shres-7/28/2006
22651<i>What makes you think they didn't come here? It's been nearly depigstuff-7/28/2006
22650You're the one who made the statements in 22529. It's not my job to do rMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22649"<i>So you see Brinker has is 13 and 9 currently in the right and wroMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22648"<i>He has already credited you with the 'invite' of other peMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22647I was looking at Hulbert's table from last February and trying to figure outMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22646"<i>The point is, they are supposed to be their own financial advisorMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22645Stockalot, I disagree if you are claiming that Hulbert is a fraud. Having lookedMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22644Thanks, but I wasn't claiming it wasn't possible, only that there is insMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22643stockalot said: <<Dija claims that anyone should have known to sell the Qdijaexyahoo-7/28/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):