SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
EARTHLINK (ELNK)
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2553 38 0 ELNK
Emcee:  PeterR1700 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2278Wouldn't this be a hoot. MSFT spends millions to help the FTC and FCC prevenJohn Dunigan-2/4/2001
2277and that's a good thing! :0)10K a day-2/2/2001
2276<i>Don't have time to read all that stuff. </i> Yeah, I guess tOeconomicus-2/2/2001
2275errr. i don't know. i agree resistance is futile. EarLink. they sent me on10K a day-2/2/2001
2274Did the ease of starting a community bank prevent Citi and BofA from getting hugOeconomicus-2/2/2001
2273Bob - the msft rumor is a good one. wouldn't surprise me in the least. and iPeterR1700-2/2/2001
2272No! The price of servers! (tongue in cheek --> Not really funny) cgi.ebay.co10K a day-2/2/2001
2271that explains the spike. Where was MSN/MSFT last year when we needed them. Lov tMark S.-2/2/2001
2270I recall that senario. Wierd relationship. FON is having their own problems righMark S.-2/2/2001
2269PS: This is the supposed explanation for the million shares that have traded sinOeconomicus-2/2/2001
2268someone on yahoo board said september. the deal is they can "initiate"Oeconomicus-2/2/2001
2267FON'S strike date to exercise a purchase (I believe) is mid 2001. That info PeterR1700-2/2/2001
2266The relation with FON is very confusing. They partnered up, invested even more mMark S.-2/2/2001
2265Addi - fwiw, yes - i can see 30's -40's. Why? Nearly 5m subs represents PeterR1700-2/2/2001
2264I'm sure FON has a very aggressive contract that gives them leverage in the PeterR1700-2/2/2001
2263I appreciate anyone's throughts on the following question: Does anyone thinkuu-2/2/2001
2262True, I suppose, but at $90 per subscriber, it seems everyone assumes it can'Oeconomicus-2/1/2001
2261Bob - though its unspoken, i have a feeling elnk is always in play. almost 5m suPeterR1700-2/1/2001
2260FWIW, $8 looks like decent support. We need some news to stimulate interest or wOeconomicus-2/1/2001
2259Bob - the finance vs marketing dilemma is huge. Clearly, marketing dollars are aPeterR1700-2/1/2001
2258<i>My guess is that is why elnk is spending so much to brand...</i> Oeconomicus-1/31/2001
2257Bob - $90 a customer seems awfully cheap. Re: TA..I'm not a technical guy. PeterR1700-1/31/2001
2256Yes. At yesterday's close, the total market cap was $1.096 billion, accordinOeconomicus-1/31/2001
2255Bob re: $90 per sub. Do you mean relative to current share price? PPeterR1700-1/31/2001
2254bob: i didn't listen to the cc. the earnings report "appears" to bPeterR1700-1/31/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):