SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
The Roaring Twenty 1998
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
338 8 0
Emcee:  White Shoes Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
238 MFNX - I know you aren't into SEC filings, but this is another great one: sDale Baker-1/2/1999
237 LCOS - if we are going to include a portal I think we should narrow it down to Dale Baker-1/2/1999
236 For 1999, i'd say LCOS kicking off its popularity with football.. THDO haAppleby-1/1/1999
235 I will certainly play closer attention to the 1999 picks after that track recorDale Baker-1/1/1999
234 Great suggestions from your watchlist Dale -- you've been busy! Regarding White Shoes-1/1/1999
233 I looked through my watch lists for E-commerce consultants. SE is the purest pDale Baker-1/1/1999
232 I like MXTR over the next year, which should suit the portfolio's purposes.Dale Baker-1/1/1999
231 Ballard Power (BLDCF) is one of the most exciting companies in a long time. AmWhite Shoes-1/1/1999
230 I'm wary of PEG. You can make a very long list of companies, especially inWhite Shoes-1/1/1999
229 On MXTR perhaps we can come to an accommodation based on the following prognostWhite Shoes-1/1/1999
228 10-Q! You mean you actually read those? :) Thinking about exactly how RNWK wiWhite Shoes-1/1/1999
227 PLCM - I had the same reaction when I first heard about it - not another videocDale Baker-1/1/1999
226 Good post on why MXTR is a 1999 pick: techstocks.comDale Baker-1/1/1999
225 WS – RNWK's latest 10-Q spells out why I like it. This isn't an E-tailDale Baker-1/1/1999
224 On another note, adding 200 more shares (just a nibble) of CMIV at $5 1/4. TooWhite Shoes-12/31/1998
223 I stand (actually sit) corrected. That's excellent performance, WS. I agreDale Baker-12/31/1998
222 But I did trade the portfolio quite a bit. I dumped the bad micro caps (no runWhite Shoes-12/31/1998
221 If you had traded the 1998 portfolio, getting out after the micro-cap runups anDale Baker-12/31/1998
220 Hi, I just looked at Network Associates. Seems wildly overvalued to me BWDIK? White Shoes-12/31/1998
219 It's early in the morning here and your thoughtful response deserves one inDale Baker-12/31/1998
218 Hi Dale, yep, GNET, INSO, OTEXF sure seem to be all the rage now and gaining stWhite Shoes-12/31/1998
217 Dale, great to hear from you. Rather than make an exhaustive search I'll pWhite Shoes-12/31/1998
216 Here we go for 1999: I wanted to make WCOM my top pick but a market cap of $12Dale Baker-12/27/1998
215 A few more thoughts before I post my picks. Last year's rules emphasized maDale Baker-12/27/1998
214 WS, I am starting my research today. A few preliminary thoughts: I suggest youDale Baker-12/26/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):