SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
International Consortiums
An SI Board Since August 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
49 4 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
24August 15, 2005 Uranium shortage poses threat By Angela Jameson, Industrial CoWharf Rat-8/16/2005
23Right. If the world is to have nuclear energy then it should be opened up on a bone_less-8/16/2005
22Strange we were discussing this last night. The time has come!sandintoes-8/15/2005
21<i>"still a problem...let along NEW waste"</i> Right but one_less-8/15/2005
20Big wishes.... and the waste!....still not answered...and the waste we have fromSkywatcher-8/15/2005
19The primary question here is 'Why Not'? The question is not 'Why Noone_less-8/15/2005
18Right. The hypocrisy is analogous to the alcoholic abusive father comparing pot one_less-8/15/2005
17abc.net.auSkywatcher-8/15/2005
16ananuclear.org CCSkywatcher-8/15/2005
15nirs.org CCSkywatcher-8/15/2005
14Nuclear Communications Network worldnuclear.orgone_less-8/15/2005
13International Nuclear Network International Nuclear Network is a full service inone_less-8/15/2005
12Thanks.one_less-8/15/2005
11I read through this a while back. Thought it was interesting. kiddofspeed.com JBTFD-8/15/2005
10<i>"From what I've read he is also prety anti nuclear energy so ione_less-8/15/2005
9if memory serves me he used to work at Chevron and has some experience in the enJBTFD-8/15/2005
8doneone_less-8/15/2005
7You might want to invite this guy: Message 21601687JBTFD-8/15/2005
6Excellent points. Solar, wind, tidal etc all need to be developed as well. Nucleone_less-8/15/2005
5sure...I'll be back.... just to make sure the nuclear question has balance..Skywatcher-8/15/2005
4You seem to have misunderstood the intent of the thread Chris. There are plentyone_less-8/15/2005
3how's this? BUSH AND COMPANY PUSH AND PUSH AND PUSH FOR NEW GENERATION OF NUSkywatcher-8/15/2005
2Policy statement: How's this for starters? <b>The International Conone_less-8/15/2005
1ITER ofes.fusion.doe.govone_less-8/15/2005
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News