SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 6 0
Emcee:  Iceberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
244 ICE, I just thought of another possibility to look out for... Look at techstockGottfried-4/26/1997
243 ICE, >><i>is it best to not respond at all to a type II poster in Gottfried-4/26/1997
242 Stan, Herb and Bill, If looking up information for a response to a type II Iceberg-4/26/1997
241 Ice, What Herb and Bill said in #239 & 240 goes for me too. Also, if we haStan Walker-4/26/1997
240 <<If we look up the information ourselves, we become victimized by the tyBill Ulrich-4/25/1997
239 Ice , Re : Responses to type II post . I have a folder on my desktop that has Herb Fuller-4/25/1997
238 >If we wait for the type II poster to gather data we may have a long wait. TIceberg-4/25/1997
237 Ice If we wait for the type II poster to gather data we may have a long wait. Stan Walker-4/25/1997
236 Herb, your posts are always wanted. The chart looks to me like IOM is building Gottfried-4/25/1997
235 Ice--Gottfried ,>>> If I can comment .<<< A quick look at IoHerb Fuller-4/25/1997
234 >Now we're getting somewhere. What expectations? That earnings will growIceberg-4/25/1997
233 ICE, >><i>Earnings growth probably isn't the answer. It more liGottfried-4/25/1997
232 Chat: Larry/angles >Can't figure out his angle Larry, Perhaps anglIceberg-4/25/1997
231 Chat personal:- Thanks for your help in responding on the other thread. CanLarry S.-4/25/1997
230 To all: here is what I consider to be an exemplary response to a type II post Iceberg-4/25/1997
229 >It is entirely conceivable that another society, more evolved than ours, miIceberg-4/25/1997
228 ICE, re 'averaging down', yes that is a subject worthy of discussion. IGottfried-4/24/1997
227 >I would like us to make a list of tacit assumptions that underlie our partiIceberg-4/24/1997
226 >I treated this post as a type II, called Susan Stillings at IR immediately.Iceberg-4/24/1997
225 ICE, I must agree with everything you said in your post. What do you think ofGottfried-4/24/1997
224 >ICE, and our response should be? I think we should demand verifiable facts,Iceberg-4/24/1997
223 Ice/All, Please see my message to Todd regarding the post about KE selling shaStan Walker-4/24/1997
222 Gottfried , Re:>>>what do the initials FUD stand for?<<< &lHerb Fuller-4/24/1997
221 Herb, what do the initials FUD stand for? Gottfried<end>Gottfried-4/24/1997
220 Linda , Re :>>> Question about Steve Wiz being in violation of SEC ruHerb Fuller-4/24/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):