SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silkroad
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
626 32 0
Emcee:  ahhaha Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
251 No. But don't believe what the words seem to say. There is no information tahhaha-3/1/1999
250 Off Topic? <i>...PASADENA--Physicists at the California Institute of Tecwonk-3/1/1999
249 Kachina: Not taking sides here, but there is a valid patent granted 10/6/98. wonk-3/1/1999
248 I noted both your lengthy posts with considerable interest. I am NOT qualifieVentureSum-3/1/1999
247 The point I'm trying to make is that the wavelength extension has nothing tahhaha-3/1/1999
246 This is from my brother who is a research scientist at Max Planck institute. HiKachina-3/1/1999
245 First of all, let me point out that there was an error in that. The wavelengthGeorge T. Santamaria-3/1/1999
244 You said a friend of your friend is investing in the company. I assume thereforahhaha-2/28/1999
243 Well now Kachina, Just how do we get conned into losing our money? This threadSector Investor-2/28/1999
242 Perfect. A better response to prove that you are a shill for this highly questKachina-2/28/1999
241 95%? why not 100%? It's that other 5% that is going to enable a friend of ahhaha-2/27/1999
240 Hi - I have read this tread, and I have read the web site, and I have done so bKachina-2/27/1999
239 By the way I looked you up and noticed that you had posted here something whichahhaha-2/27/1999
238 #reply-8003955 wonk-2/26/1999
237 Would someone please provide some info or links regarding slowing of speed of lAfsar Ali-2/26/1999
236 I had no problem downloading the .pdf in IE 5.0.ahhaha-2/26/1999
235 Well, I tried to get the white paper and it crashed my browser a number of timeGeorge T. Santamaria-2/25/1999
234 It's very interesting. The most bullish thing has occurred and no one caresahhaha-2/25/1999
233 You may want to read the new white paper on their site first: www.silkroadcorpahhaha-2/24/1999
232 Good info. I'd appreciate the source of your quote that I may read more.VentureSum-2/24/1999
231 I should have caught this before. Re Fadis, you suggested: >Perhaps he dFrank A. Coluccio-2/21/1999
230 From SR's chief technician: <i>To add, a proprietary sampling techniahhaha-2/20/1999
229 Vertiginous! Which might be a suitable term for Silkroad too and its dizzying cGeorge Gilder-2/19/1999
228 I gather the width of the Silkroad carrier is one gigahertz, and they claim to George Gilder-2/19/1999
227 Thousands have succeeded, but if you are having trouble, email tcasey@gildertecGeorge Gilder-2/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News