SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Net Perceptions, Inc. (NETP)
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2908 31 0 NETP
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2608Let's get one thing straight, the number actually reported to the SEC is -$.Carl R.-7/30/2000
2607One last note you mentioned, and I agree with... The last quarter was a disappobernieb2-7/30/2000
2606hey Victor - quick gut feeling, think their emphasis on the larger accounts and bernieb2-7/30/2000
2605BTW - I emailed Tony and requested that we be notified if the company does sub-lbernieb2-7/30/2000
2604Smear_Campaign - I have to agree and disagree, your both right and wrong on the bernieb2-7/30/2000
2603Victor - Referring to the numbers of .15 or .12, this will become a guage as to bernieb2-7/30/2000
2602<i>(it did not win but was in the last 6 out of about 400 entries).</i&rupert1-7/30/2000
2601smear campaign: In response to your request for a debate on a takover candidate rupert1-7/30/2000
2600smear campaign: You only have to look at my predictions in the Competition to grupert1-7/30/2000
2599Carl and smear campaign: My post did not say that any official record was otherrupert1-7/30/2000
2598Victor, to say that earnings were really -.12 rather than -.15 is akin to not coSmear_campaign-7/30/2000
2597I wasn't referring to the SEC filing. So far as I know, the two main sourcesCarl R.-7/30/2000
2596Carl: I tried to convey that in my post. I stated that the earnings were -0.15rupert1-7/29/2000
2595I was referring to institutional investors moving in. Not a buyout, but who knobernieb2-7/29/2000
2594Thanks anyway John, Victor was saying it was on NETPs site, never noticed it butbernieb2-7/29/2000
2593First Call is reporting earnings for the quarter as -$.15, not -$.12 in their vaCarl R.-7/29/2000
2592<i>Finally, this is only a one year comparison. It might be that in 2, 3 oCarl R.-7/29/2000
2591Bernie: I have posted under gnu222 for the last time in the post you referred trupert1-7/29/2000
2590Sorry but did not make a copy since I discovered NETP while watching the programJohn Liu-7/29/2000
2589huh, your not gnu222 on Yahoo???bernieb2-7/29/2000
2588I've been thinking that at 45 it was undervalued compared to the rest of thebernieb2-7/29/2000
2587Thanks Victorbernieb2-7/29/2000
2586bernie: No that was "gnu222" I am "victor_si_uk". <g>rupert1-7/29/2000
2585Bernie: I was deliberately vague and did not use the book value concept. I havrupert1-7/29/2000
2584bernie: I just checked and found they have removed the ABC Nightline links from rupert1-7/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):