SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Sapiens International Corporation (SPNSF): Turn around...?
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1936 6 0 SPNSF
Emcee:  uu Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
261 Thanks for your analysis. I've been following SPNSF for 2-3 weeks now and pippin-8/29/1997
260 The way that I see it the conversion of Preferred to common will have a posjerry cooper-8/29/1997
259 I contacted one of m y former colleagues at Sapiens and he says the 2.2M converuu-8/29/1997
258 That ZMAX post was put on every Y2k thread he could find. I DON,T believe him. Sam Golden-8/29/1997
257 I agree - It's not that we don't appreciate your keeping us up to date,Kevin-8/29/1997
256 THIS HAPPENS TO BE A SAPIENS THREAD NOT A Z MAX THREAD. PLEASE RESPECT THE SAPISTANLEY COHEN-8/29/1997
255 You sure have my agreement as a general rule. However, I think a single short wpckr-8/29/1997
254 Can we move the ZMAX (or whatever) discussion to its appropriate threadd and leuu-8/29/1997
253 Nanda, I thought the purpose of the Silicon Investor forum is to share investmG. W.-8/29/1997
252 Addi, This has nothing to do with private placement in Feb???Sam Golden-8/29/1997
251 Re: conversion of preferred stock to common stock I wished I knew what this wauu-8/29/1997
250 DD, Dont you think if this caused any serious dilution the stock would have tanSam Golden-8/29/1997
249 G.W. This is what they call spamming. Boy you are on lot of threads with this nNanda-8/29/1997
248 You might want to check out ZMAX Corporation (ZMAX OTC). This could now be a sG. W.-8/29/1997
247 sg: Depending on what the aggregate "interest/dividend" payments werDD™-8/29/1997
246 First thoughts are 2.7mil share dilution, but stock would have tanked by now. PSam Golden-8/29/1997
245 Nanda: Random thoughts are appreciated. I will try to do some research into DD™-8/29/1997
244 Thoughts would be appreciated. RE: conversion DDDD™-8/29/1997
243 Addi, can you please shed some light on todays news about conversion of prefereNanda-8/29/1997
242 NANDA-- I agree. I will stay with and add to my currant stash of Y2K issues. WhCaptain Jack-8/28/1997
241 Sounds like you are subscribing to CANSLIM methodology. Very good strategy witDD™-8/28/1997
240 Sam David & Nanda.. Thanks for your posts, I have always been leery when aregine-8/28/1997
239 Regine, I started buying at 5 and bought more today at 8 5/8.Read all the postsSam Golden-8/28/1997
238 >>>A question please, I read all the postings and was wandering if it Xennor-8/28/1997
237 ZMAX...been there done that. Lot of other y2k stocks are better buys. Good luckNanda-8/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):