SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Zeev's Turnips
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
644 39 0
Emcee:  Pink Minion Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
269On a lighter vein: cnn.com <I>The connection was initially made by the RSBHX-12/5/2000
268Hi Zeev - thanks. Unfortunately, LSI has also warned. So, your turnips may have Bosco-12/5/2000
267Well, I would hate it to come down to Seminole, but if we are going to follow thZeev Hed-12/5/2000
266Good morning, Carl - you know, what will happen if this thing finally settles? WBosco-12/5/2000
265You are correct re:Lieberman causing the composition of the Senate to become 51/Carl R.-12/4/2000
264<ot>Hi SbH - where do you think Zeev got the manure to feed his turnips<Bosco-12/4/2000
263Wait a minute. This site is not about Zeev's turnips is it? It looks more SBHX-12/4/2000
262Hi SbH - yes, many shades and hues here :)! It really depends on the predispositBosco-12/4/2000
261Bosco, I'm not sure what vacate and set aside really means. They did not oSBHX-12/4/2000
260Hi SbH - I think these 9 justices are the best politicians [in a respectful way,Bosco-12/4/2000
259Bosco, Perhaps the USSC has found that middle ground? :) Actually, I'm noSBHX-12/4/2000
258Zeev, <I>the accidental "dimpling" simply because handling acciSBHX-12/4/2000
257Hi Carl - evidently, the USSC has found a way to make a ruling w/o being absolutBosco-12/4/2000
256Hi Carl - Personally, my preference is also "doing the right thing," eBosco-12/4/2000
255Yes, I have seen the reference to McKay backing off. I can see the argument for Carl R.-12/4/2000
254Hi Carl - you sez "I am puzzled by why they would want to meet this WednesdBosco-12/4/2000
253I have no problem counting partially detached chad, but I vehemently oppose counCarl R.-12/3/2000
252I don't buy the accidental "dimpling" simply because handling acciZeev Hed-12/3/2000
251Here is some testimony as to the types of problems I have mentioned, ballots altCarl R.-12/3/2000
250Carl, you are absolutely right, that is why I was in favor of Gore suggestion toZeev Hed-12/3/2000
249Note Zeev that your fear cuts both ways. Suppose that Gore succeeds in getting vCarl R.-12/3/2000
248Zeev, the first Gore "expert" on Sat. said some voters, instead of putU.B. Green-12/3/2000
247As for the "legislative solution", I am puzzled by why they would wantCarl R.-12/3/2000
246Hi Carl - As I ve pointed out previously, I think there may very well be some imBosco-12/3/2000
245You are correct that if we end up with any legislative body making the decision,Carl R.-12/3/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News